Brennan, M C E (2014) Sustainable construction in the 21st century: An educational perspective to shifting the paradigm. PhD thesis, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.
Abstract
Sustainability is a ubiquitous topic debated across the globe. The potential of the construction industry to alleviate the effects of environmental damage whilst contributing to the social and economic dimension of sustainability are great. Despite many efforts by both Government and Higher Education Institutions, the adoption of sustainable construction practices is well below where it needs to be. Much work needs to be done in reprogramming the minds of those in an economically facing industry to ensure a sustainable future. This research looks at the efficacy of an educational intervention for such change and the use of psychological variables in assisting the process. This thesis contributes to original knowledge through the development of a validated measurement tool designed to measure attitudes towards sustainable development in a construction context. The tool was used to investigate associations between attitudes and psychological constructs. The research makes a further contribution through the development of an educational intervention which supports the use of alternative pedagogies for sustainability education. The research was conducted in four phases, with phases one and three making the contribution to knowledge. A concurrent mixed methodology approach was adopted utilising an embedded design. Quantitative data was collected in phase one with this phase running concurrently alongside the other phases throughout the project. Qualitative data was collected in phases two and four with phase three adopting a mixed model approach. The conclusions drawn from phase one were that there are associations between emotional self-efficacy and positive attitudes towards sustainability but not with optimism. Phase two highlighted that changes in attitudes towards sustainability would need to be driven through, legislation, education and leadership. This resulted in the development of an intervention with students at LJMU based on principles of student-centred learning. Analysis of the student feedback indicated that the intervention had a positive impact on students with perceptions changing as to how important sustainability is and how important the construction industry is for this to be achieved. The intervention tool developed within this research has the potential to be adapted for use with a wide variety of audiences, in particular those in positions of high level decision making. A top-down and a bottom-up approach is recommended if we are to achieve the aspiration of a sustainable future.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Cotgrave, A |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | education; higher education; measurement; sustainability; decision making; feedback; government; leadership; learning; legislation; sustainable construction; sustainable development; |
| Index terms: | methodology, decision-making, sustainable development, sustainability education, sustainable construction practice, sustainable construction, student-centred, legislation, construction industry, bottom-up approach, self-efficacy, dimension, pedagogy, paradigm, higher education, higher education institution |
| Subjects: | educational innovation, health safety and environment, sustainable construction, research methods, legal systems, urban planning, human factors and perception, industry analysis, student experience, educational institutions, decision analysis, teaching methods, education and knowledge transfer, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Governance, Research Practice, Education, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Risk Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here