Risk management in Republic of Ireland PPP toll roads

Burke, R (2014) Risk management in Republic of Ireland PPP toll roads. PhD thesis, Queen's University Belfast, UK.

Abstract

Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) have emerged worldwide as an attractive way for government to finance infrastructure. This study aims to examine key stakeholders' perceptions on the allocation, transfer and pricing of risk in Irish toll road PPPs. It examines how stakeholders' perceptions on these issues may be changing as access to finance becomes more difficult in the PPP market. Furthermore, the research investigates how and why some PPP risks are allocated, transferred and mitigated through a stakeholder approach. The study therefore makes an important contribution to the stakeholder literature. The study examined three in-depth case studies of Irish toll road PPPs. 40 in-depth interviews were conducted with 38 key stakeholders including public sector representatives, operators, contractors, equity investors, senior debt financiers, advisors and interest groups involved in toll road PPPs in the Republic of Ireland. Through their interaction on risk issues these stakeholders have developed a number of relationships. Three types of stakeholder relationships are explored: the relationship between the public sector bodies responsible for PPPs; the relationship between the procuring authorities and the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV); and finally the relationship between the SPY members. The findings suggest that the Irish Government's treatment of risk and its transfer to the private partner in PPPs is changing over time. These changes are occurring in the midst of a global financial crisis where access to finance for infrastructural investment has become very difficult. The findings suggest that the Irish Government may be willing to provide more guarantees on future PPPs. Pricing of demand risk also differs from the Irish Government's rhetoric that it is being priced realistically. In practice, it was found to be priced aggressively by the Spy in order to win PPP contracts. The National Roads Authority (NRA) has worked collaboratively and shown flexibility with the SPV to resolve a number of risks in PPP. The study also found that risk can be allocated, transferred and managed through a number of different relationships in PPPs. The SPV companies work collaboratively together to manage risk in PPPs, although they do transfer considerable risks to subcontractors.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: contracts; debt; government; guarantees; infrastructure; interview; investment; Ireland; partnership; pricing; public sector; roads; stakeholders; subcontractor; toll
Index terms: toll, global financial crisis, interview, demand risk, guarantee, subcontractor, partnership, public sector, investor, case study, pricing, special purpose vehicle, interest group, interaction, Ireland, public private partnership, risk management
Subjects: contract structure, sociology, partnership management, administrative law, risk assessment, data collection methods, financial and cost management, financial risk, Geography, economic concepts, behavioral psychology, transportation engineering, practitioner, economic analysis, contractual arrangements
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, International Construction, Risk Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here