Elnaas, E (2014) The decision to use off-site manufacturing systems for house-building projects in the UK. PhD thesis, University of Brighton, UK.
Abstract
The decision to use Off-Site Manufacturing (OSM) as a construction strategy in the house building industry is often made using ‘gut-feel' or poor information and at the wrong time and for the wrong reasons. Research has shown that the correct use of OSM in house building has the potential to address some of the key challenges facing the UK house building industry, such as the increase in supply of new homes, skills shortage gap, the need to reduce CO2 emissions and environmental impacts, reduce overall project duration, minimise overall project costs, and reduce defects in new housing. However, with poor decision making surrounding the use of OSM, this potential remains untapped. At the strategic level, construction decisions that require executive data and the use of expert systems and decision support systems for evaluation are often unstructured or semi-structured. Such support systems are currently not available with respect to the use of OSM as a construction strategy. There is evidence to suggest that this results in poor understanding of the decision making process and the issues surrounding the process. This thesis therefore aims to develop a Decision Support Model (DSM) that can be used in practice to guide the choice between OSM and Traditional On-Site (TOS) production as a construction strategy in house building projects in the UK. The study was based on two main sources of data collection: firstly, an in-depth literature review of existing knowledge associated with the use of OSM and decision making process in the construction industry with particular reference to house building; and secondly, primary data collection using semi-structured interviews, questionnaires with key construction practitioners, and case based precedence review of numerous housing projects that have used both OSM and TOS in the UK. The findings from both sources were analysed and used to develop the DSM. The research initially established a robust set of sixteen key decision factors; then produced a Severity Indices Matrix (SIM); and finally developed a methodology for arriving at a decision outcome. The DSM provides a reliable system that transforms an unstructured situation into a structured decision making process and improves the quality of information required to arrive at an outcome within its project environment. The research has identified the most suitable time in the project life cycle that the decision needs to be taken to achieve an optimum outcome. It has also established that the client, the architect and the main contractor must all be involved in the decision making process.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building industry; decision making; duration; environmental impact; manufacturing; off-site; skills; UK |
| Index terms: | off-site manufacturing, interview, decision support, strategy, literature review, housing project, project cost, construction practitioner, methodology, decision-making, expert system, evidence, environmental impact, questionnaire, housing, main contractor, CO2 emissions, life cycle, decision-making process, building industry, architect, executive, duration, construction industry |
| Subjects: | value management, data collection methods, profession, air quality, data analysis and analytics, professional development, management, economics, industry analysis, data management, project controls, decision analysis, environmental impact, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, construction type, manufacturing engineering, research methods, housing and residential development |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Risk Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Time Control, Urban Studies, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here