Building information modelling (BIM) aided waste minimisation framework

Liu, Z (2014) Building information modelling (BIM) aided waste minimisation framework. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.

Abstract

Building design can have a major impact on sustainability through material efficiency and construction waste minimisation (CWM). The construction industry consumes over 420 million tonnes of material resources every year and generates 120 million tonnes of waste containing approximately 13 million tonnes of unused materials. The current and on-going field of CWM research is focused on separate project stages with an overwhelming endeavour to manage on-site waste. Although design stages are vital to achieve progress towards CWM, currently, there are insufficient tools for CWM. In recent years, Building Information Modelling (BIM) has been adopted to improve sustainable building design, such as energy efficiency and carbon reduction. Very little has been achieved in this field of research to evaluate the use of BIM to aid CWM during design. However, recent literature emphasises a need to carry out further research in this context. This research aims to investigate the use of BIM as a platform to help with CWM during design stages by developing and validating a BIM-aided CWM (BaW) Framework. A mixed research method, known as triangulation, was adopted as the research design method. Research data was collected through a set of data collection methods, i.e. selfadministered postal questionnaire (N=100 distributed, n=50 completed), and semistructured follow-up interviews (n=11) with architects from the top 100 UK architectural companies. Descriptive statistics and constant comparative methods were used for data analysis. The BaW Framework was developed based on the findings of literature review, questionnaire survey and interviews. The BaW Framework validation process included a validation questionnaire (N=6) and validation interviews (N=6) with architects. Key research findings revealed that: BIM has the potential to aid CWM during design; Concept and Design Development stages have major potential in helping waste reduction through BIM; BIM-enhanced practices (i.e. clash detection, detailing, visualisation and simulation, and improved communication and collaboration) have impacts on waste reduction; BIM has the most potential to address waste causes (e.g. ineffective coordination and communication, and design changes); and the BaW Framework has the potential to enable improvements towards waste minimisation throughout all design stages. Participating architects recommended that the adoption of the BaW Framework could enrich both CWM and BIM practices, and most importantly, would enhance waste reduction performance in design. The content should be suitable for project stakeholders, architects in particular, when dealing with construction waste and BIM during design.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: coordination; efficiency; sustainability; building design; building information model; building information modelling; collaboration; communication; sustainable building; visualisation; architects; project stakeholder; stakeholders; UK; energy efficiency; information modelling; interview; questionnaire survey; simulation
Index terms: platform, carbon reduction, building design, building information modelling, energy efficiency, efficiency, information modelling, research design, architect, construction waste, coordination, statistics, design development, construction industry, minimization, data analysis, interview, survey, design change, literature review, design stage, questionnaire, validation, project stakeholder, collaboration, sustainable building, sustainable building design, triangulation, waste reduction, visualization
Subjects: algorithms, sustainability assessment, digital design, design process, sustainable construction, architectural design, contractual arrangements, professional practice, climate science, waste management, sociology, information systems, industry analysis, performance management, management, design practice, professional development, sustainability and energy, energy systems, data analysis and analytics, research design and methodology, mathematical modelling, profession, data collection methods
Topics: Procurement, Sustainability, Quality Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here