Teaching and learning activities through the use of mobile phone technology

Suresh, S and Al-Khafaji, A W (2009) Teaching and learning activities through the use of mobile phone technology. In: Dainty, A R J (ed.) Proceedings of 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2009, Nottingham, UK.

Abstract

In the twenty-first century, mobile phone technology applications have been developed, tested and implemented in various mediums. The aim of the research was to investigate teaching and learning activities through the use of mobile phone technology. To achieve this aim, four objectives were identified and discussed along with the methodology used. A total of 23% of the students involved in the research demonstrated two types of learning by reflection (i.e. reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action). Furthermore, the research also suggests that teaching and learning activity through the use of mobile technology facilitated deeper approach to learning. Evaluation through questionnaire showed that mobile phone technology has helped students augment their learning objectives. The research concluded that three of the six board theory based activity: Learning and teaching support activities, Constructivist activities and Behaviourist activities have been embedded through the use of mobile technology. The other three theory based activity i.e. Situated activities, Collaborative activities and Informal and lifelong activities could be considered for future work.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: behaviourist activity; constructivist activity; mobile phone technology; reflection-in-action
Index terms: mobile technology, reflection, methodology, questionnaire
Subjects: data collection methods, digital technology, research methods, professional development
Topics: Digital Applications, Research Practice, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here