Sustainable innovation for Queensland's housing design: A case study

Johnston, M; Guaralda, M and Sawang, S (2014) Sustainable innovation for Queensland's housing design: A case study. Construction Economics and Building, 14(4), pp. 11-31. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

This research provides an assessment tool that assists the selection process of sustainability in detached suburban housing. It investigates the implications of using different design and construction methods including architecturally designed houses, developer housing and prefabricated houses. The study simulates one example of the three types of houses that have been chosen to fulfil a real client brief on a real site on the Sunshine Coast, Queensland Australia. Criteria for sustainability assessment are formulated based on literature reviews, exemplar designs and similar research projects for which the houses can be adequately evaluated. This criterion covers aspects including energy use, materials and thermal performance. The data is collected using computer models and sustainability assessment software to compare and draw conclusions on the success of each house.; Our study indicates that architecturally designed housing with prefabricated building techniques are a better alternative to generic developer style housing. Our research provides an insight into the implications of three key elements of sustainability including energy use, materials and thermal performance. Designers, builders, developers and home-buyers are given an insight into some options currently available on the housing market and how the choices made during early design stages can provide a more positive environmental impact. Michael Johnston et al.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: attitude; innovation; perception; prefabricated; sustainable housing
Index terms: housing design, sustainability assessment, case study, design and construction, thermal performance, environmental impact, energy use, literature review, prefabricated building, designer, Australia, prefabricated house, early design stage, option, Queensland, sustainable housing, builder, housing
Subjects: energy systems, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, housing and residential development, decision analysis, building construction, Geography, environmental impact, design process, practitioner, construction type, profession, sustainability assessment, data collection methods, construction integration
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here