Thomson, C S; El-Haram, M A and Emmanuel, R (2009) Mapping knowledge during sustainability assessment within a PPP school project. In: Dainty, A R J (ed.) Proceedings of 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2009, Nottingham, UK.
Abstract
Increasingly, sustainability assessment is applied as a valuable tool for assessing and monitoring the performance of construction projects in delivering sustainable buildings. Sustainability assessment has been traditionally regarded as a technical process to determine the performance of projects against environmental, social and economic criteria. Calls are emerging for assessment to evolve as a tool better integrated with the subjectively based decisions taken across the project lifecycle, supporting stakeholder engagement and promoting a culture of learning about sustainability in practice. In order for assessment to fully realise this wider role; it is necessary to recognise the significance played by knowledge and its flow between stakeholders in the promotion of a common understanding of the actions required to deliver a sustainable urban environment. This paper presents the findings of a knowledge mapping exercise focused on understanding the nature of this flow during sustainability assessment across the lifecycle of 6 new schools funded under a public private partnership (PPP) contract. The analysis identified the key sources of knowledge drawn upon by decision-makers during four identified phases of sustainability assessment. Knowledge exists in a variety of types and forms, and the key sources were classified around an emerging set of categories relevant to the context in question. Variations were observed in the types of knowledge held by the different stakeholders and considered the nature of its transfer between the stakeholders and the key-decision maker. Identified was the need to support those managing the assessment with a range of knowledge sources, with particular focus on experts who can guide and support inexperienced project teams.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | sustainability assessment; knowledge management; partnering; case study |
| Index terms: | knowledge management, monitoring, variation, stakeholder engagement, mapping, project lifecycle, sustainable building, partnering, exercise, lifecycle, public private partnership, urban environment, case study, promotion, project team, construction project, sustainability assessment |
| Subjects: | project delivery, control systems, management, health behaviours and lifestyles, professional development, spatial and geospatial analysis, contractual arrangements, contractual condition, data collection methods, urban sustainability, sustainable construction, partnership management, production management, sustainability assessment, community and social dimensions, project completion |
| Topics: | Procurement, Project Management, Human Resources, Research Practice, Sustainability, Site Management, Urban Studies, Contract Administration, Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here