Soliman, M M A I (2014) Risk management in international construction joint ventures in Egypt. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, UK.
Abstract
Egypt is a developing country and the construction sector has a significant impact on GDP. The development and competitiveness of the Egyptian construction sector in local and international markets are affected by many risk factors. To overcome these risks, some joint ventures are arranged between the Egyptian and the International companies. These joint ventures needs studying to understand the risks and the changes, which are inherent in these companies, and the projects that they execute. Positioning this research to introduce the risk factors to address the risks associated with the joint ventures in Egyptian construction market. This research taken place before 25 January 2011 when the Egyptian revolution began, deposing President Mubarak. Since then many changes have faced the Egyptian and international companies and have created risks in the political and economic situation. Some of project contracts were examined to find out the risk environment faced by joint ventures. In addition, the research established a theoretical model to identify those risk factors for International construction joint ventures in Egypt based on the collection and analysis of quantitative data collected through questionnaires. The research investigated risk management process in the business of joint ventures in which a number of new risk factors identified for the Egyptian construction market, which can be added to the existing factors that noted from the literature review. The main contribution of this research is the identification of the risk factors in three levels, which are; the country, the joint venture company and the project specific levels. The top risks of the country level are: Different applicable law, Currency Exchange, Equipment Availability, Government act, and regulations; for the joint venture level are: Financial capability, Connections with the host government, Strategic complementary; and for the project specific level are: materials; location of the project; sub- contractor capacity. Considering these risk factors facilitates clear decision making in arranging joint ventures in Egypt. Moreover, it mitigates the potential of these risks to occur.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Smith, N and Moodley, K |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competitiveness; construction sector; contracts; decision making; developing country; Egypt; equipment; government; joint venture; markets; materials; regulation; risk management |
| Index terms: | developing country, literature review, decision-making, questionnaire, regulation, construction sector, contractor capacity, joint venture, international construction, risk management, risk factor, international market, competitiveness, Egypt, markets, construction market |
| Subjects: | development economics, Geography, environmental hazards, market analysis, strategic management, economic analysis, professional development, political science, industry analysis, decision analysis, business, risk assessment, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Risk Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Governance, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here