A socio-ecological framework for improving the psychological health of foreign workers in developing countries: The case of saudi construction industry

Alrasheed, Haitham (2015) A socio-ecological framework for improving the psychological health of foreign workers in developing countries: The case of saudi construction industry. PhD thesis, University of New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

Previous studies on occupational health and safety (OHS) management in construction havelargely focused on injuries and physical health, but marginally on an important, complex issuethat is the psychological health of foreign workers, leaving a significant knowledge gap inconstruction OHS research globally. Hence, this research aimed at investigating factorsaffecting the psychological health of foreign workers in the construction industry anddeveloping a framework of interventions to address them. Socio-ecological theory was used aslens to analyse the problem and to derive solutions from multiple perspectives. Thepsychological health of workers is a more serious concern in developing nations, particularly inthe GCC countries where foreign workers form the major workforce, warranting extensiveresearch. The Saudi Arabian construction industry was therefore chosen as the context for thisstudy. A mixed-methods strategy, involving both qualitative and quantitative data collection andanalyses, was adopted whereby interviews with 39 participants and a questionnaire survey with108 respondents from the construction industry of Riyadh were conducted. Fifteen factorscritically affecting the psychological health of foreign construction workers in this region werediscovered. Subsequently, a framework of interventions from three perspectives such asorganisation, community and state, is suggested to counteract them. This research contributessignificantly to knowledge and practice. First, the study adds a new dimension to OHS researchin construction, which concerns socio-psychological aspects, rather than the traditional physical,technical and managerial dimensions. Second, it has demonstrated how the socio-ecologicaltheory might be applied to investigate complex problems in construction and derive solutionsfrom multiple perspectives. Finally, OHS management in the GCC construction is poorlyresearched and the issue of psychological health has almost never been explored though it is anurgent need. This study fills this gap and functions as the seminal work on this topic in theregion. For practice, the study offers a holistic framework for policy makers and government authorities to enable them to improve the OHS condition, especially the psychological health, inthe Saudi Arabian construction sector. Similarly, valuable insights are offered for constructionorganisation as to how their OHS management systems might be improved.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: foreign workers; psychological health; developing countries; occupational health and safety; socioecological theory; Saudi Arabia
Index terms: foreign worker, socioecological theory, construction industry, dimension, construction worker, Saudi Arabia, questionnaire, psychological health, construction sector, injury, management system, developing country, interview, survey, developing nation, occupational health and safety, strategy
Subjects: practitioner, environmental science, development economics, Geography, business, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, management, industry analysis, health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, International Construction, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here