Complex factors related to capital construction project success: A case study

Lambert, E L (2015) Complex factors related to capital construction project success: A case study. PhD thesis, Capella University, USA.

Abstract

Capital construction projects are under constant scrutiny because they require public funding and are often faced with problems like time and cost overruns. Researchers and project management practitioners have investigated factors that contribute to the success of these projects. However, based on review of the literature, project management success is generally measured in terms of projects’ completion within the constraints of approved scope, cost, time, quality, resources and risk. While there is now increased interest in expanding the debate on the factors that contribute to a capital construction project’s success, there is still a dearth in scholarly research about this problem. This study explores how a multiple organizational program management team in the Southeastern United States was been able to successfully manage a capital construction program of multiple component projects through all phases. The study explores the case through the coordination theoretical construct. To gather data for this single case study research, 14 members of the program management team were interviewed, and documents from the program’s archives were examined. In order to assure robustness of the research findings, the inclusion of multiple data sources allowing for triangulation and corroboration of information was applied to data collection. From the data nine themes including strategic planning, work packages, stakeholder management, coordinated monitor and control, coordination and collaboration, shared authority and responsibility, collaborative leadership, program team management, and risk management evolved. Identification and examination of these factors may add to the debate about what constitute successful project outcomes, and expanding the traditionally accepted success factors to include nontraditional factors that may contribute to complex capital construction programs and projects’ success.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Bottomly, G
Uncontrolled Keywords: coordination; collaboration; funding; leadership; project success; risk management; strategic planning; stakeholder; United States; case study; cost overrun; construction project
Index terms: package, project success, case study, cost overrun, project outcome, strategic planning, funding, risk management, project management, coordination, United States, team management, success factor, collaboration, construction project, program, documents, practitioner, stakeholder management, triangulation
Subjects: contractual arrangements, economic analysis, project completion, practitioner, production management, Geography, participation process, financial and cost management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data collection methods, risk assessment, research design and methodology, management, software systems, professional development, project management theory and practice
Topics: Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Project Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Procurement, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here