Maradza, E N (2015) Adaptation of industry BIM process standards in a large construction firm. PhD thesis, University of Reading, UK.
Abstract
The United Kingdom (UK) construction industry is witnessing an increased uptake of Building Information Modelling (BIM) process standards. This research investigates how the adaptation of new industry BIM process standards influences the large construction firm's capacity to deliver projects and sustain competitive advantage. Previous studies have examined the roles of industry product and technical standards, and the standards within the firm, that are associated with innovation, but there is little work on industry BIM process standards. To understand this, the research develops a conceptual framework, building upon the work of Davies and Brady (2000) on project based firm (PBF) organisational capabilities. The empirical research focuses on the Publicly Available Specification (PAS) 1192:2012 (1-3), which is a successor to British Standard (BS) 1192:2007, and the Construction Operations Building information exchange (COBie) standards. These industry BIM process standards were developed to facilitate, coordinate and control information management activities amongst project teams. Following a preliminary UK industry investigation, a case study strategy is adopted to understand the adaptation of BIM process standards in the large construction firm. Data is drawn from: a) observations of practice in three ongoing projects, b) semi-structured interviews, and c) secondary publications. Thematic data analysis shows that adaptation of the industry process standards transforms the firm's ability to manage, integrate and coordinate business and project processes such as bidding, design and project management. Adaptation stimulates new ways of collaborating design activities and transforms the firm's interactive relations with IT suppliers and standards developers. However, the standards are resisted within the business, and in the projects because they evolve outside the firm. Adaptation becomes unstable because the standards have systemic linkages, are rapidly changing and attract multiple interpretations. The study contributes to previous work by articulating how the adaptation of industry process standards contributes to the development of project capabilities by the large construction firm. The study identifies mediating complexities that require management attention such as the systemic linkages with other industry standards. This research focused on the single large construction firm, in future, research could assess the implications of the findings in the wider construction industry. Further research could address how other types of industry standards influence the ability to develop strategic and operational level capabilities within firms that produce the built environment.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bidding; building information modelling; case study; competitive advantage; information management; innovation; interview; project management |
| Index terms: | conceptual framework, complexity, publication, bidding, interview, data analysis, specification, United Kingdom, strategy, construction firm, information exchange, successor, built environment, investigation, construction industry, project management, project team, competitive advantage, building information modelling, case study, project-based firm, linkage, construction operation, adaptation |
| Subjects: | management, project management theory and practice, contractual condition, systems engineering, information systems, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, business, data collection methods, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, data science, theoretical framing, Geography, market analysis, user focus, organization, research dissemination and communication, operations research, construction operations, bidding |
| Topics: | Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Site Management, Time Control, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here