Policies to avoid cost overruns in infrastructure projects: Critical evaluation and recommendations

Lind, H and Brunes, F (2014) Policies to avoid cost overruns in infrastructure projects: Critical evaluation and recommendations. Construction Economics and Building, 14(3), pp. 74-85. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

Many infrastructure projects have cost overruns and there has been a lot of research both on why these cost overruns occur and what can be done to reduce hem. Bent Flyvbjerg is the leading researcher in the area and in this article his proposals are used as the starting point. Besides a literature review, a questionnaire was sent out to experienced Swedish project managers to find out what they thought could reduce cost overruns. The literature review and the questionnaire were the foundation for the proposals formulated in this article. Proposals concerned three areas: (1). Organisational macro-structure, e.g. using more PPP projects but also decentralisation of budgets where cost overruns in one project in a region lead to less alternative projects in the specific region. (2). Organisational quality: It should be easy to see when and where cost overruns occur and who was responsible. There should be a well-developed knowledge management system in the organisation and an organisation culture of openness with a focus on improvements. (3). Organisational processes, e.g. a systematic use of external reviewers in different stages of a project.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost overruns; infrastructure projects; policy measures
Index terms: knowledge management system, proposal, questionnaire, decentralization, policy measure, project manager, literature review, cost overrun, infrastructure project
Subjects: project planning, infrastructure and transport systems, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, information systems, political science, data collection methods, profession, policy studies
Topics: Governance, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here