Seed, L (2015) The dynamics of BIM adoption: a mixed methods study of BIM as an innovation within the United Kingdom construction industry. PhD thesis, University of Huddersfield, UK.
Abstract
Building Information Modelling is an approach that fully integrates people, systems, business structures and practices into a collaborative and highly automated process, applicable to the design, construction and operation of buildings. With the United Kingdom Construction Industry (UKCI), the UK Government, as the industry’s largest client, has mandated the use of BIM on all public sector projects by 2016. By considering BIM as an innovation, a total of 104 potential dynamics of BIM adoption were identified from literature along with potential variations by company type and size. Through the application of equal status mixed methods and robust stratified random sampling of 335 respondents, to match the profile of the UKCI, the key findings of the study are: Overall 62% of respondents have adopted BIM, with adoption highest among Consultants and Main Contractors, and lowest among Sub-Contractors, with a substantial increase in adoption following the Government Mandate. Although there is scope for the increased utilisation of BIM for those who have adopted it, 10% of respondents have no plans to adopt BIM. 23 significant dynamics of BIM adoption were identified, with 15 of these inhibiting adoption and 8 supporting adoption. For large companies the government mandate and advantages of BIM as a collaboration tool were the more significant supporting dynamics, while for smaller companies the cost of BIM was the more significant inhibiting dynamic. For Main Contractors, the robustness of existing practices and for Sub-Contactors the cost and complexity of BIM, along with company survival were the most significant inhibiting dynamics. The results suggest that under Rogers’s diffusion of innovation model, while relative advantage is an important supporting characteristic of BIM, compatibility with existing practices Is an equally important but inhibiting characteristic, while observability is not relevant.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Yeadon-Lee, A |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; client; collaboration; complexity; diffusion; government; innovation; public sector; sub-contractor; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | mandate, United Kingdom, sub-contractor, variation, collaboration, complexity, mixed method, automated process, relative advantage, main contractor, building information modelling, public sector, sampling, dynamics, company survival, diffusion of innovation, construction industry |
| Subjects: | innovation studies, practitioner, automation and robotics, Geography, data collection methods, business, administrative law, industry analysis, information systems, systems engineering, political science, contractual condition, professional development, management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Governance, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here