Siriwardena, M L (2015) Organisational learning in construction: a framework from the process improvement perspective. PhD thesis, University of Salford, UK.
Abstract
The construction industry, one of the significant sectors of most regional and national economies, is being continuously urged to improve its performance at project and organisational level. The urgent need to improve the processes of construction projects and organisations has been highlighted in a number of industry reports. In this regard, organisational learning has been considered as essential to facilitate process improvement, innovation and sustaining the competitiveness of construction organisations, and also of the sector as a whole. Although there are a number of initiatives to facilitate organisational learning in construction contexts, literature reveals that the organisations are still finding it difficult to identify ways to effectively facilitate learning to improve their processes and performance. Therefore, this research aims to bridge the gap by developing a framework to facilitate organisational learning in construction contexts. In doing so, the process improvement perspective has been taken into consideration. Given the constructive nature of the research, design science was used as the overarching methodology. Within this overall approach, case studies were used to inform, develop and validate the research process and the outcomes. An extensive literature review, document analysis, workshops, participant observations are the key techniques used to achieve the research aim. The main outcome of this research is the framework to facilitate organisational learning within construction context. The research further highlighted the complex adaptive nature of the construction contexts and processes, and it has been incorporated into the Procurer, Provider and User (PPU) framework. In addition, the integration of the role of process maturity and time dependent meta roles of stakeholders in the context of complex construction projects, to facilitate learning and improvement, is one the significant contributions to the body of knowledge. The developed framework could be adopted by any organisations, which are contracting, consultancy, client’s organisations and/or regulatory bodies when they seek to improve their processes while facilitating organisational learning. It is recommended that industry practitioners / strategic level decision makers take consider their time and stake dependent meta-role and the resultant information flows as a basis for evaluating and updating their current organisational processes.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competitiveness; contracting; innovation; integration; organisational learning; roles; stakeholders; workshops |
| Index terms: | document analysis, workshop, case study, construction organization, construction industry, national economy, competitiveness, information flow, literature review, science, organizational learning, observation, process improvement, consultancy, body of knowledge, practitioner, construction project, methodology, integration |
| Subjects: | production management, research methods, market analysis, specialized education, practitioner, construction type, organization, knowledge management, economic analysis, professional development, management, industry analysis, information systems, organizational analysis, data collection methods, data science, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Education, Project Management, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here