Analysis and evaluation of criteria for pre-selecting contractors in the Saudi Arabian construction sector

Al-Otaibi, M and Price, A D F (2010) Analysis and evaluation of criteria for pre-selecting contractors in the Saudi Arabian construction sector. In: Egbu, C (ed.) Proceedings of 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2010, Leeds, UK.

Abstract

The construction industry in Saudi Arabia is experiencing dramatic developments and expansion due to recent changes in the Kingdom’s socio-economic development policies. The selection of construction contractors is an essential component in the success of projects yet there is both a lack of skilled manpower and a lack of experience in terms of managing major projects within Saudi Arabia. Thus, appropriate tools are required to select, evaluate, measure and monitor the performance of construction contractors. This paper critically analyses and evaluates current techniques for pre-selecting contractors and identifies the most appropriate techniques and criteria that could be adopted in Saudi Arabia. This has been achieved by undertaking a critical analysis of the literature and by carrying out preliminary interviews with practitioners in Saudi Arabia. The findings of this initial research have been used to establish the scope of work that will later form the basis of PhD research.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: contractor pre-selection; evaluation; model; measurement; performance
Index terms: major project, interview, economic development, Saudi Arabia, construction industry, construction sector, construction contractor, practitioner
Subjects: economic development, Geography, industry analysis, data collection methods, practitioner, strategic project management
Topics: Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here