Walters, D J (2015) How do project managers become experts: An examination of the engineering procurement and construction management (EPCM) industry. EdD thesis, Northern Illinois University, USA.
Abstract
The engineering procurement and construction management (EPCM) industry in the Chicagoland area is unique in that its customer base is primarily made up of oil and manufacturing companies. This uniqueness extends to the project managers in the EPCM industry, in that, the majority of the project managers who enter the industry with the title project manager, or get promoted to project manager, really don’t have a clear understanding of the processes or steps required to achieve project management expertise. As a result, little is known about the path of project managers and how they achieve the outcomes that characterize the project management achievement levels – novice, intermediate, or expert – that designate their professional achievement. The purpose of this study was to explore the project management domain -- or area of knowledge -- in the EPCM industry and the expertise that underlies and delineates a project manager’s competencies (achievements) -- novice, intermediate, and expert -- for the purpose of understanding how these competencies (achievements) are accomplished in the project management domain. I used three studies in a qualitative method to investigate project managers’ growth from novice to expert in the project management domain. Three project managers with varying project management experience, were asked to share their stories and experiences in the context of the EPCM industry. The results of this study were revealing, each of the three project managers used different and similar methods to negotiate the novice to expert path, while achieving varying measures of success in their project management careers.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Hung, W-C |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | careers; manufacturing; professional; project manager |
| Index terms: | project manager, project management, qualitative method, career |
| Subjects: | research design and methodology, profession, professional development, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here