Adoko, M T (2016) Developing a cost overrun predictive model for complex systems development projects. PhD thesis, George Washington University, USA.
Abstract
While system complexity is on the rise across many product lines, the resources required to successfully design and implement complex systems remain constrained. Because financiers of complex systems development efforts actively monitor project implementation cost, project performance models are needed to help project managers predict their cost compliance and avoid cost overruns. This dissertation presents a cost overrun predictive model for complex systems development projects. The dissertation is based on a research undertaken to develop the cost overrun predictive model using five known drivers of complex systems development cost: system performance, technology maturity, schedule, risk, and reliability. The dissertation demonstrates how large-scale system development project managers and systems engineers can use the model to support decision making aimed at achieving compliance with the Nunn-McCurdy cost overrun requirements. Sixty-nine aerospace and defense systems development projects were analyzed using logistic regression leading to the development of the predictive model. Model variables include system performance, Technology Readiness Levels (TRL), risk, schedule, and reliability. The final model predictability accuracy was 62.1% for significant cost overrun and 83.3% for no significant cost overrun respectively, within the statistical boundaries of the research. Overall, the model is inconclusive on 10 cases, predicts 29 cases as significant cost overruns and 30 cases as on budget. For the aerospace projects, the model is inconclusive 7.14% of the cases; predicts 35.71% of the cases as significant cost overruns; and predicts 57.14% of the cases as no significant overrun outcomes. For defense projects, the model is inconclusive 19.51% of the cases; predicts 46.34% of the cases as significant cost overruns; and 34.15% of the cases as no significant cost overrun outcomes. Therefore, the model predicts more cost overruns for the defense projects than for the aerospace projects. Specifically the model predicts approximately 36% significant cost overruns for aerospace projects and 46% for defense projects. The model identifies schedule and reliability as the key determinants of whether or not a large complex systems development project will experience cost overrun, within constraints of the data. Projects that achieve both the defined schedule and reliability thresholds will have the lowest level of probability for a cost overrun outcome. That is, projects that fail to meet the requirements of the schedule and reliability criteria are more likely to experience significant cost overruns, within the statistical boundaries of the model. Interestingly, the model demonstrates that the TRL threshold alone is not adequate for preventing a cost overrun. However, the interaction between TRL and system performance parameters decreases the probability of a cost overrun.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Mazzuchi, T and Sarkani, S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complex systems; cost overrun; predictive model; schedule; systems engineering; technology readiness levels; aerospace engineering; systems science |
| Index terms: | decision-making, complexity, boundaries, compliance, science, overrun, accuracy, project performance, implementation, determinant, interaction, dissertation, project manager, logistic regression, engineer, cost overrun, systems engineering, complex system |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, risk assessment, profession, decision analysis, project controls, statistical analysis, systems engineering, project management theory and practice, professional development, property law, contractual arrangements, research dissemination and communication, specialized education, behavioral psychology, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Procurement, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Health and Safety, Education, Legal Issues, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here