Alzaben, A A (2016) Under the shadow of sharia law: the implementation of Government Procurement Agreement provisions by Saudi Arabian government tenders and procurement law. PhD thesis, University of Hull, UK.
Abstract
This research is a scientific study about the approach of sharia law to the implementation of the requirements of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) in government tenders and procurement law in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia has reformed its legal system in order to be part of the WTO. Furthermore, Saudi Arabia has adopted measures to liberalize its procurement market, as it modified the procurement law in 2006. However, Saudi Arabia is not party to the GPA. The protective measures and lack of transparency are the main characteristics of the procurement law which contradict the main principles of the GPA which are transparency and non-discrimination. The impact of joining the WTO for Saudi Arabia was fruitful, as the quality of goods and services has been improved, and also the settlement of trade disputes has become professional. Therefore, as Saudi Arabia suffers from the low quality of products and services in some sectors, and stalled projects have become a relatively common feature, the main aim of this research is to bridge the gap between the GPA and procurement law. The chapters of this research will discuss the legitimacy of the GPA in the eyes of sharia law, which is the main source for all Saudi laws. The main contradiction between the GPA and procurement law will be reconciled according to the public interest methods which are approved by sharia law. The research considers some cases from the Board of Grievances [the administrative court] as well as some of the Council of Ministers' decisions in Saudi Arabia. They show that there is an urgent need to reform the procurement law provisions, in particular provisions related to transparency and non-discrimination. In addition, these provisions might be the main reasons for the delay in joining the GPA by Saudi Arabia.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Varney, M and Bovis, C |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | discrimination; dispute; government; procurement; professional; Saudi Arabia; sharia law; world trade organization |
| Index terms: | legitimacy, discrimination, government procurement, dispute, Saudi Arabia, public interest, World Trade Organization, transparency, implementation |
| Subjects: | professional ethics, Geography, contractual arrangements, sociology, political science, procurement strategy, professional development, institutional frameworks, dispute resolution |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Procurement, Organizational Design, Information Management, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here