Dzokoto, F K (2016) Information behaviour of construction project actors. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.
Abstract
Construction is one of the largest industry sectors in terms of size and output in the UK. The sector contributes about 10% directly to the UK’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and drives historical GDP growth. However, construction projects and organisations continue to underperform at significant levels which is underpinned by actors' information behaviours (IBs). The pursuit of improvement has resulted in high-level research in information modelling, information flow, and integrated project delivery. This has highlighted the need for research and improvement strategies on information seeking, sharing and integrated working. Despite the significance of the underlying attributes to project failures and underperformance, not much attention has been devoted to actors' IBs and/or Information-Seeking Behaviours (ISBs). As a result, insights into the information culture, the IBs and ISBs of actors in construction organisations remain elusive in extant literature. Similarly, research into the factors that influence actors' information-seeking and information use/task performance behaviours remains hidden. Hence, this research empirically investigates the fundamental behaviours by which project actors seek, share and use information, and the factors that influence such behaviours in Construction organisations. The study employed qualitative and quantitative inquiries to investigate actors in construction organisations and project environments to test the commonality of archetypical Information seeking behaviour types (ISBTs) which were distilled from literature. This enabled assessments of the extent of actors' adoption of a particular ISBT and the key factors that influence their decision-making during task performance. Analysis of quantitative and qualitative data revealed five key ISBTs (such as associate, cognitive, systematic, serendipity/fortuitous and social media ISBT) that actors exhibit during task performance. In addition, the study found seven (7) key information-seeking behaviours factors (such as accessibility, collaboration, work condition, age, source/channels, trust and organisational setup) that predict actors' ISBTs. In addition, 10 key factors (such as accuracy, currency, context specific, efficiency, effectiveness, relevance, reliability, satisfaction, quality and useable) were found to influence actors' ISBTs. By way of consolidating the research findings, an ISBT model was developed. The model indicates the relationship between the influencing information seeking and information use/task performance factors and the ISBTs. In view of these findings, it is vital to plan construction project delivery and organisation management to integrate actors' ISBTs into the project life cycle (PLC) to enhance performance improvement. Similarly, organisation need to create avenues to support actors' ISB preferences during the design development phases to facilitate effective information-seeking, information sharing and information use.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | information behaviour; information flow; integrated project delivery; interview |
| Index terms: | industry sector, interview, information flow, accuracy, construction project delivery, integrated project delivery, strategy, construction project, collaboration, decision-making, preference, gross domestic product, satisfaction, project failure, efficiency, construction organization, accessibility, information modelling, life cycle, social media, information sharing, effectiveness, performance improvement, design development |
| Subjects: | decision-making and reasoning, inclusive design, production management, digital design, design process, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, organization, project completion, project controls, decision analysis, industry analysis, information systems, management, performance measurement, performance management, data exchange, professional development, technology adoption, project delivery, data collection methods, value management |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Procurement, Project Management, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Time Control, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here