Khodabuccus, R A (2016) Commercialising zero carbon housing design: towards an economic and socio-technically informed approach. EngD thesis, University of Surrey, UK.
Abstract
Implementing zero carbon homes within commercial housing developments has proven difficult. This has resulted in a stagnated zero carbon housing sector and a lack of truly innovative designs within national house builder portfolios. Key industry stakeholders justify this by reference to a number of economic, regulatory, market, technological and structural based issues. This research develops an approach to zero carbon homes that brings design and commercial perspectives together to address these major issues. Out of this approach, an optimised design with a unique economic model has been developed. The economics of this design challenge the widely accepted notions of house price and affordability in traditional builds. The research findings are presented through a life cycle cost analysis. A significant finding from this research is that zero carbon homes could be better marketed on economic rather than environmental benefits so long as the user practice, technological and structural barriers are also addressed at the design stage. An exploration of stakeholder attitudes towards the mainstream take up is also carried out. It identifies and positions the key stakeholders involved in the implementation process using the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) and Transitions Theory, generating a better understanding of what and who is required to transition the sector towards decarbonisation. In depth interviews and an observation study were conducted with these participants. This section of the research examines stakeholders opinions on whether the optimised zero carbon home is commercially viable. New insights are generated and existing insights from the literature are contextualised using the optimised design. This creates an analysis of its commercial potential. The research concludes by demonstrating the need to conduct further studies into wider systemic issues and to explore alternative routes to market.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Burningham, K; Lee, J and Bill, D |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | housing development; interview; life cycle cost; socio-technical systems; stakeholders |
| Index terms: | housing development, builder, life cycle cost, interview, housing, affordability, design stage, socio-technical system, housing design, exploration, life cycle cost analysis, economic model, implementation, house price |
| Subjects: | design process, research methods, theoretical framing, practitioner, construction type, economic analysis, professional practice, contractual arrangements, environmental resource management, economics, data collection methods, modelling and simulation |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Procurement, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here