Louis, J (2016) Simulation analysis, monitoring, and control of operations. PhD thesis, Purdue University, USA.
Abstract
Construction operations are usually spread across large areas and require the remote collaboration between multiple disparate resources, characteristics that create logistical challenges for obtaining a real-time operational overview of the status on the worksite. This lack of real-time overview or operation monitoring precludes the possibility of real-time control of operations, a factor that further impedes the adoption of automation techniques on the construction worksite. This dissertation provides a means for implementing closed-loop control of construction operations through a synergistic combination between real-time data captured from construction equipment and an operation model created by using the modeling concepts developed for discrete event simulation of construction. Specifically, this research provides methods to process discrete event simulation models without a-priori knowledge of duration data and a-priori knowledge of material amounts. Strategies are also prescribed for handling the occurrence of unforeseen events and for synthesizing sensor data to provide the entity state information to the operation model. This research implements the developed methods in a standalone computer application and a virtual construction site is leveraged to demonstrate first the utility of real-time monitoring and then automated control for an earthmoving operation. Another case study that further showcases the analytical capabilities that enable real-time operational decision-making is also provided in this dissertation. The case study specifically demonstrates the various types of operational insights and metrics that can be synthesized from various locations of the worksite and aspects of the operation in real-time to aid in monitoring, control, and decision-making for the operation. Currently and without the use of the provided methodology, such information would be impractical, cost-prohibitive, and even impossible to obtain. This research provides a practical implementation of systems and control theoretic concepts by leveraging the advancements made in modeling and simulation tools and seeks to leverage the growing ubiquity of sensors on the construction site. Apart from enabling a means for the real-time monitoring and control of worksites, the methodologies provided herein enable automation in construction to be achieved at the operations level and address the issue of “islands of automation” that has been experienced in prior automation attempts. This research thus lays the groundwork for fully automated construction worksites. The developed research also facilitates the documentation of the operation as it is performed in the form of a timestamped log of events. This documentation can be analyzed after the operation for purposes of performance assessment and future planning. Unlike current methods of time-studies for operation analysis, wherein only a subset of the operation is recorded, the documentation capabilities provided by this research provides the complete record of the operation as it was performed.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Dunston, P S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | duration; construction equipment; construction site; equipment; sensors; automation; collaboration; documentation; earthmoving; monitoring; time control; case study; simulation |
| Index terms: | decision-making, methodology, collaboration, time control, simulation tool, simulation analysis, sensor data, documentation, strategy, construction site, monitoring, performance assessment, modelling, earthmoving, implementation, duration, dissertation, automation, discrete event simulation, construction equipment, case study, real-time data, construction operation, automated construction, computer application |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, work location, control systems, data collection methods, project controls, data management, decision analysis, professional development, construction equipment, management, software systems, contractual arrangements, construction operations, analytical methods, design analysis, research products and data, research dissemination and communication, assessment methods, automation and robotics, research methods |
| Topics: | Procurement, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Plant and Equipment, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here