McAleenan, C (2016) Operation analysis and control: a paradigm shift in construction safety management. PhD thesis, University of South Wales, UK.
Abstract
In the 1990s the author embarked upon a project that would fundamentally alter the theoretical basis of safety, health and wellbeing management in the construction sector and beyond. The emerging risk management approach was flawed, relying on an element of chance to deliver safe outcomes. The author's research into development and delivery of the Operation Analysis and Control (OAC) led to the realisation that vision zero (or zero harm) was achievable, given the intellectual and technological capability at our disposal. What was missing was an understanding of the delivery mechanisms, how in fact could the intellect and technology be positively exploited to make zero harm a real possibility. The OAC model, developed from first principles, free from preconceived notions, attached to the then risk assessment (and the emerging risk management) approaches was so unencumbered that it was to become recognised by ISSA for its cross-jurisdictional and cross-disciplinary nature. The major thrust has been to establish the efficacy of the OAC approach within the construction industry. While OAC was in essence a model with a focus on designing operation processes, leading ultimately to zero harm there was another side to the coin, namely safe design or more correctly inherently safe[r] design, the ability to deliver on the prevention through design agenda. Here the OAC had a direct impact on the aim of delivering prevention through design, becoming a major feature of the PtD education approach, demonstrating a strong interrelationship between the projects. Delivering safety management as a quality systems approach set a new theoretical foundation upon which future health and safety education, training and performance could be built. The new paradigm (OAC) put workers at the heart of safety management, not as an adjunct as was implied in the accepted norm at the time. The production and proving of the OAC model and the scholastic work associated with developing Prevention through Design (PtD) learning and teaching packages are examples of outputs from the author's original work in safety, health and wellbeing. The original and guiding premise was that:Technologically and intellectually we have it within our capability to [deliver vision zero] prevent fatal or life altering accidents from ever occurring ...Workers need to be at the heart of safety management not external agents affected by its consequences and with acceptance of competence and agency (active participation) comes cognition; the ability for workers to challenge their historical and social situation. This thesis presents a critical reflection of the author's work, using two major projects as exemplar outputs; OAC model and Prevention through Design education. The reflection discusses the interrelationship between the projects, including a synthesis of the author's work as demonstrated by the projects presented. There is commentary on the current standing of the projects together with a critical review of the significant and original contribution the author's work makes to the academic field of construction safety, health and wellbeing. A concluding chapter addresses lessons learnt and advances the author's thoughts on further research in this area, exploring where the OAC model and Prevention through Design should go next in pursuit of vision zero harm in construction.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Kinuthia, J; Ryall, P and Franklin, K |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competence; construction safety; health and safety; risk management; safety; wellbeing |
| Index terms: | risk management, paradigm, risk assessment, reflection, heart, construction industry, prevention, package, becoming, major project, design education, well-being, cognition, technological capability, competence, agent, construction safety, construction sector, safety management, agency, health and safety, health and wellbeing |
| Subjects: | practitioner, innovation and technology management, contractual arrangements, strategic project management, health safety and environment, financial risk, medical science and clinical practice, philosophical process, cognitive psychology, professional education, risk assessment, mental health and wellbeing, professional development, personnel development, education and knowledge transfer, industry analysis, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, sociology |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Human Resources, Procurement, Sustainability, Risk Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here