Onsarigo, L M (2016) Cost comparison of horizontal auger boring and open-cut construction methods for culvert installations. PhD thesis, Indiana State University, USA.
Abstract
The underground infrastructure serves as the primary means of transporting our indispensable needs such as drinking water, wastewater, gas, oil, and power. Culverts are an important part of this infrastructure. They provide a pathway for water to pass under roadways and railways, and prevent flooding. However, like most other assets, culverts deteriorate over time and require replacement. Horizontal auger boring (HAB) offers several advantages over the conventional open-cut method for installation of culverts. In addition to the well-known advantages of trenchless technologies, in terms of less traffic and environmental disruptions, they can provide economic replacements. The main research questions were: (1) Is HAB an economical alternative to the open-cut technique for culvert installations? (2) Is it more economical to use an ODOT (Ohio Department of Transportation) crew instead of a contracted crew? And (3) what are the productivity improvement opportunities that can reduce the installation cost? To answer these questions, three comparisons for HAB and open-cut installations were conducted: (1) comparisons of bid prices, (2) cost comparison of observed installations, and (3) road user cost comparison. The research study also explored areas of potential productivity improvement for the HAB operations. The research findings indicate that the unit costs of the HAB and open-cut culverts installed by the ODOT crews are considerably lower than those installed by the contractors. The research findings also indicate that HAB is an economical alternative for culvert replacement when compared to open cut, for culverts with a depth of cover exceeding three feet.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Atalah, A |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | railway; replacement; traffic; productivity; underground infrastructure; cost analysis; cost engineering |
| Index terms: | replacement, cost analysis, productivity, underground infrastructure, unit cost, flooding, construction method, cost engineering |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, financial and cost management, building construction, management, environmental hazards, materials science |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Site Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here