Sanei, H (2016) Discipline breakdown structure: Bridging project management and systems engineering to form an integrated management system in multidisciplinary rail projects. PhD thesis, University College London, UK.
Abstract
The complexity of multidisciplinary projects requires that many specialities and disciplines work together. In rail infrastructure projects, the term 'systems engineering (SE)' is being widely used, yet it is still loosely defined. This PhD thesis proposes the use of a Disciplinary Breakdown Structure (DBS), an approach that better integrates SE as it is currently understood with traditional project management (PM) to make PM more efficient. A review of PM, SE and their relationship, particularly in the rail sector, identified gaps in performance, the most significant of which is a lack of integration between the SE and PM activities. Case study material was examined and a survey was conducted. The results highlighted the lack of consensus and consistency of the definition of SE and its application by project practitioners at various levels. Interface management (IM) was identified as a key factor contributing in project failure or success. IM was reviewed in the context of SE and PM, and existing methods and solutions were examined. The DBS as a new solution, was developed and introduced to improve the IM life cycle from definition to closure. This solution is based on industry discipline sectors (in this case, the rail sector) and therefore it is independent from project specific requirement. Exploring more detail of the DBS revealed its capability in integrating SE and PM more generally. The DBS is a modular solution (with a potential to become an industry standard) that provides a basis for the rapid development of project-bespoke management systems, improving PM efficiency by saving time and resources. The approach has been tested in two major rail project case studies in the UK and one in Canada and the results, benefits, constraints and the areas of improvements are discussed in more detail.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Smith, A |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; efficiency; failure; systems engineering; infrastructure project; integration; life cycle; Canada; UK; case studies; case study |
| Index terms: | project management, infrastructure project, case study, project failure, efficiency, systems engineering, Canada, life cycle, practitioner, interface management, integration, railway construction, complexity, management system, survey |
| Subjects: | practitioner, project completion, Geography, value management, business, data collection methods, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, organizational analysis, project management theory and practice, performance management, civil engineering, management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here