Sommer, P A (2016) The communicative accomplishment of knowledge work in the construction industry. PhD thesis, Texas A&M University, USA.
Abstract
The domestic construction industry consists of project based, dispersed organizations that face unique challenges when compared to other sectors. These challenges have largely slowed the innovative capacity of the industry. Knowledge management is a communicative practice that moves beyond data and information management systems approaches to engage the largely tacit know-how and expertise of organizational members and project stakeholders. This study attempts to further the understanding of the communicative accomplishment of knowledge work in the construction industry by engaging in both ethnographic and survey data analysis to help determine (1) how organizational members communicate what they know with others to solve problems and create capacities for action in our everyday work practice; (2) the level of knowledge management use among domestic construction organizations; (3) what motivates organizations to adopt new knowledge management practices; and (4) whether communicative knowledge management practice had measurable benefits to the organizations who were attempting to implement it. The first study is an ethnographic investigation of the communicative practice that one construction company utilized to help manage its knowledge resources. Everyday knowledge management practices observed included the use of structured occasions and planning meetings where project stakeholders engaged in the use of questioning and mentoring in a way that promoted an organizational learning culture which relied on a complex and largely unregulated network of expertise. The findings also suggest that embodied knowledge should be considered to help explain how organization actors approach problem solving episodes. Lastly, the study highlights the possibility of an organizational transactive memory system that helps organizational members know who knows what. The second quantitative study takes stock of the current levels of knowledge management practice among a sample of domestic construction companies. The study found that knowledge management systems were still relatively rare, despite the uniform belief in their value and importance. The motivation to adopt knowledge management practices was shown to indirectly increase project benefits, being mediated by both the obstacles to knowledge management adoption and specific knowledge management tool use. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in regard to each study, as well as the research project as a whole.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Barbour, J B and Barge, J K |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | culture; motivation; domestic construction; information management; knowledge management; learning; organizational learning; problem solving; project stakeholder; stakeholders |
| Index terms: | construction company, survey, motivation, face, management system, data analysis, organizational learning, mentoring, knowledge management, project stakeholder, problem solving, work practice, domestic construction, knowledge management system, construction industry, investigation |
| Subjects: | sociology, industry analysis, information systems, management, professional development, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, decision-making and reasoning, psychology, training, construction type, organization |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here