Integrated design-build management: studying institutional processes to understand project coordination & performance

Urup, L (2016) Integrated design-build management: studying institutional processes to understand project coordination & performance. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.

Abstract

An increasing number of actors contributing with their skills to design-build projects increase the need for and complexity of coordination. The design-build project delivery method proposes to coordinate actors through collaborative interaction; however, even design-build projects result in poor coordination and building of relatively poor quality. Therefore, the purpose of this research is: to gain a deeper insight into how coordination is respectively enabled and constrained; to understand how coordination relates to project performance; and, to propose methodological elements for an integrated design-build management concept. An institutional work perspective explains how design-build projects are social phenomena characterised by structures, purposeful reflective interactions and political negotiation. Furthermore, coordination is interpreted as an institutional phenomenon and specifically coordination is defined as bringing together potentially social, temporal and spatially separated work elements. Coordination mechanisms include formal structures, relational interaction, and integrative institutional processes. Similarly, project performance is defined as a temporary negotiated order of multiple institutions. The research design consists of three literature studies combined with a double-qualitative empirical study of six design-build projects. The six projects are studied through a quadric-hermeneutic method enabling insight into the phenomenon of coordination. The analysis shows that during the design process peaceful co-existence, fragmentation and occasional integration occurred. During the detailed design phase a conflict between project quality and efficient construction arose. As a result, the design process dragged on, stalled and re-circuited and the project was not fully representative of all the institutions in the project. Nevertheless, due to a combination of structure, loose coupling and informal interaction the project team was able to begin and progress the build. Further, the analysis shows that a project’s constellation of institutions is reflected in the project’s performance. Following the analysis, an integrated design-build management concept proposes new meanings and formal structures for enabling integrating constellations of institutions to improve project coordination and performance. This research project concludes that project coordination is a process of mutating constellations of institutions where conflict, competition, blending, fragmentation and the lack of collective on-going institutional work are the primary constraints to project coordination. Similarly, integrating constellations of institutions and occasional fragmentation through temporary competition enable project coordination and increase project performance.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: competition; complexity; coordination; fragmentation; project team; skills; integration; negotiation; project delivery; project performance; case study
Index terms: project performance, institutional work, design process, empirical study, meaning, fragmentation, project team, coupling, design phase, interaction, case study, competition, integration, negotiation, coordination, research design, complexity, project delivery
Subjects: research design and methodology, behavioral psychology, design methods, business, project delivery, sociology, market analysis, conflict resolution, organizational analysis, professional practice, project management theory and practice, management, data collection methods, research methods, systems engineering
Topics: Organizational Design, Design Practice, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here