Alhammadi, Y (2017) Developing and evaluation the implementation of construction management research in the Saudi construction industry. PhD thesis, Arizona State University, USA.
Abstract
Public construction projects in Saudi Arabia have been experiencing performance issues for the past 30 years. There have been many research efforts and publications identifying the problem and potential causes, however, there have been minimal efforts identifying how to mitigate the problem and testing to validate proposed solutions. A literature search has shown that the academic research has had minimal impact in assisting the construction industry to improve its performance. This dissertation aimed to evaluate the impact of construction management research in Saudi construction industry (SCI), and to investigate barriers that hinder the diffusion of implementing the research outcomes in the construction sector in order to develop a research roadmap to bridge the gap between academic research and practice, using the experience of other organizations that have a successful experience in developing the impact of construction management research in the construction industry. In order to achieve the aim of the study, five main objectives were set up which are: evaluate the impact of construction management research in SCI, identify the barriers that affect the implementation of construction management research in SCI, develop a research roadmap to bridge the gap between the research and practice, validating the proposed solution, and proposed implementation plan and review the result from the implementation. A literature research was performed, using 5 academic databases, identifying the impact that R&D has had on the SCI. A questionnaire was also created surveying both researchers and industry professionals. The results show evidence that the current R&D process in Saudi Arabia is not helping the SCI to increase their performance, and needs to be improved. This study provides a potential solution, and an action plan that mirrors one of the most successful research and development programs in the construction industry in the world [+1915 tests, six different countries, 31 states in the U.S. and 98% customer satisfaction]. The solution proposed in this dissertation is unique to the strengths and weaknesses of the research and development programs at universities and research centers in Saudi Arabia. This study is the first study of its kind in Saudi Arabia.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Kashiwagi, D |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction sector; construction project; performance; professional; research and development; Saudi Arabia |
| Index terms: | research centre, Saudi Arabia, database, customer satisfaction, public construction, dissertation, construction industry, testing, implementation, management research, surveying, research roadmap, questionnaire, evidence, program, research and development, construction project, publication, construction sector |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, research dissemination and communication, construction type, professional practice, contractual arrangements, production management, Geography, building construction, research management, data collection methods, research design and methodology, health monitoring assessment and metrics, service delivery, software systems, industry analysis, data management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Procurement, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Information Management, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here