Situation awareness approach to construction safety management improvement

Gheisari, M; Irizarry, J and Horn, D B (2010) Situation awareness approach to construction safety management improvement. In: Egbu, C (ed.) Proceedings of 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2010, Leeds, UK.

Abstract

Situation Awareness (SA) improves decision-making and performance in complex, dynamic environments by enhancing ambient awareness of the system-user. Until now, SA has not been considered as a potential method of improving job-site safety in construction. The purpose of this study is to provide a conceptual model of situation awareness approach to construction safety management. Developing construction management methods and support systems that centre on SA requirements can improve safety managers' decision-making processes. This study applies the Goal Directed Cognitive Task Analysis (GDTA) technique to obtain the Construction Safety Manager’s information requirements. These SA requirements lay the foundation for future role-based decision support systems that will assist construction personnel in decision making in dynamic environments such as the construction job-site.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction safety; decision making; human factors; situation awareness
Index terms: task analysis, decision-making, human factor, construction personnel, manager, decision-making process, construction safety, management method, decision support
Subjects: environmental health, occupational health and safety management, scope management, decision analysis, practitioner, management, workforce
Topics: Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Human Resources, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here