A hybrid machine learning and text-mining approach for the automated generation of early warnings in construction project management

Alsubaey, M H (2017) A hybrid machine learning and text-mining approach for the automated generation of early warnings in construction project management. PhD thesis, Cranfield University, UK.

Abstract

The thesis develops an early warning prediction methodology for project failure prediction by analysing unstructured project documentation. Project management documents contain certain subtle aspects that directly affect or contribute to various Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Extracting actionable outcomes as early warnings (EWs) from management documents (e.g. minutes and project reports) to prevent or minimise discontinuities such as delays, shortages or amendments is a challenging process. These EWs, if modelled properly, may inform the project planners and managers in advance of any impending risks. At presents, there are no suitable machine learning techniques to benchmark the identification of such EWs in construction management documents. Extraction of semantically crucial information is a challenging task which is reflected substantially as teams communicate via various project management documents. Realisation of various hidden signals from these documents in without a human interpreter is a challenging task due to the highly ambiguous nature of language used and can in turn be used to provide decision support to optimise a project’s goals by pre-emptively warning teams. Following up on the research gap, this work develops a “weak signal” classification methodology from management documents via a two-tier machine learning model. The first-tier model exploits the capability of a probabilistic Naïve Bayes classifier to extract early warnings from construction management text data. In the first step, a database corpus is prepared via a qualitative analysis of expertly-fed questionnaire responses that indicate relationships between various words and their mappings to EW classes. The second-tier model uses a Hybrid Naïve Bayes classifier which evaluates real-world construction management documents to identify the probabilistic relationship of various words used against certain EW classes and compare them with the KPIs. The work also reports on a supervised K-Nearest-Neighbour (KNN) TF-IDF methodology to cluster and model various “weak signals” based on their impact on the KPIs. The Hybrid Naïve Bayes classifier was trained on a set of documents labelled based on expertly-guided and indicated keyword categories. The overall accuracy obtained via a 5-fold cross-validation test was 68.5% which improved to 71.5% for a class-reduced (6-class) KNN-analysis. The Weak Signal analysis of the same dataset generated an overall accuracy of 64%. The results were further analysed with Jack-Knife resembling and showed consistent accuracies of 65.15%, 71.42% and 64.1% respectively.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Makatsoris, C H
Uncontrolled Keywords: accuracy; decision support; failure; construction project; documentation; key performance indicators; learning; qualitative analysis; machine learning
Index terms: project management, construction project management, planner, mining, database, key performance indicator, project failure, shortages, machine learning, dataset, project documentation, documents, questionnaire, validation, qualitative analysis, methodology, mapping, construction project, early warning, accuracy, documentation, decision support, manager
Subjects: research design and methodology, data collection methods, profession, project delivery, artificial intelligence, professional development, project management theory and practice, decision analysis, geotechnical engineering, data management, project completion, practitioner, economic analysis, project planning, spatial and geospatial analysis, research methods, financial risk, production management
Topics: Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here