Din, Z U (2017) Teaching prevention through design (PTD) principles using a non-traditional pedagogical strategy. PhD thesis, Arizona State University, USA.
Abstract
Many accidents occur during construction and maintenance of facilities. Both research and practice have demonstrated that decisions made during the design and planning phases before work at a construction site can influence workers’ safety. The Prevention through Design (PtD) concept is the consideration of construction site safety in the design of a project. In one research study, more than 200 fatality investigation reports were reviewed, and the results showed that 42 percent of fatalities reviewed were linked to the absence of the PtD concept (Behm, 2005). This work indicates that the associated risk that contributed to the incident would have been reduced or eliminated if PtD had been utilized. Researchers have identified the reasons for not applying the PtD concept. The predominant reason is that most architects and design engineers do not learn about construction safety and construction processes required to eliminate construction safety hazards through design. Therefore, Prevention through Design education of architects, design engineers, and construction managers is vital. However, in most curricula, there is no room for an entire course focused on PtD. Therefore, one researcher implemented 70 minutes long lecture-based intervention in a project management class of the civil engineering discipline, but it did not prove effective (Behm, Culvenor, & Dixon, 2014). Hence, there is an opportunity to teach PtD to students using alternative teaching strategies such as computer games. Computer games are routinely considered as the most important and influential medium by college students. In this research study, a serious game and a paper-based game (paper version of the serious game) were developed and implemented. The aim of the study was to measure the effectiveness of alternative teaching methods to train students for safe design thinking. The result shows that the computer game engaged the students in comprehensive hazard recognition challenges. The learning experience of the students was compared to two other interventions: paper-based game and lecture-based teaching. The in-class lecture and the computer game were effective in delivering the prevention through design topics. The game was more effective compared to the lecture. The paper-based game failed to motivate students to learn. This dissertation discusses the possible reasons for success and failures of these pedagogical approaches.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Gibson, G E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | education; effectiveness; failure; hazards; construction safety; construction site; games; civil engineering; learning; safety; teaching; teaching method; architects; civil engineer |
| Index terms: | civil engineer, construction site, strategy, construction safety, construction manager, design education, construction process, engineer, college student, project management, prevention, fatalities, dissertation, learning experience, architect, effectiveness, investigation, teaching method |
| Subjects: | financial risk, building construction, professional education, research dissemination and communication, health risk and incident analysis, management, performance management, teaching methods, project management theory and practice, sociology, environmental health, data collection methods, profession, learning methods, work location |
| Topics: | Site Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Education, Quality Management, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here