El-Sabek, L M (2017) Framework for managing integration challenges of production planning and control in international construction mega-projects. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
The public often associates mega-projects with poor performance due to delays and budget overruns. International mega-projects (IMPs) comprise multiple subprojects across widely spread areas, often with independent resources and individual plans. Such decentralization into clusters increases the integration planning and execution challenges. Changes to the schedule, budget, and scope, as well as poor design, are critical integration challenges within and across subprojects of mega-projects. International characteristics of project delivery compound additional complexity on integration aspects. It is essential for the production planning system in IMPs to be robust in addressing integration challenges to achieve necessary interface and realistic reporting. This study aimed to reveal the significance of operational gaps and resolve the integration challenges in IMPs. To achieve its goal, the study was divided to three phases. They are: 1) synthesize literature and practice with respect to production planning and control systems; 2) evaluate the performance of the production planning and control system at a mega-scale in a case study; 3) develop a framework to provide workable solutions to address the unique and complex integration challenges of IMPs. The Last Planner System (LPS©) was found to be an emerging production planning and control system with a promising potential. Fostered to complement, not to replace, the existing LPS© model, the proposed IMPact framework is a roadmap aiming to improve the operations of IMPs, keeping them on track, and potentially replacing the negative image of IMPs with positive impressions. The validated framework provided a conceptual practical solution, based in LPS©, to address the challenges that project teams on IMPs have within and across subprojects. It is intended to be an adaptive system in an effort to improve delivery and performance of IMPs.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | McCabe, B Y |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; control system; integration; performance; production planning; project team; control system; case study |
| Index terms: | production planning, decentralization, budget overrun, adaptive system, complexity, integration, project team, project delivery, case study, control system, international construction, last planner system |
| Subjects: | theoretical framing, systems engineering, strategic management, organizational analysis, financial and cost management, political science, data collection methods, project delivery, monitoring and control, project controls |
| Topics: | Project Management, Time Control, Engineering Principles, International Construction, Procurement, Research Practice, Governance, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here