Exploiting BIM in energy efficient domestic retrofit: evaluation of benefits and barriers

Gholami, E (2017) Exploiting BIM in energy efficient domestic retrofit: evaluation of benefits and barriers. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool, UK.

Abstract

Energy efficient retrofitting of the existing building stock is important because of the need to reduce CO2 emissions and improve building energy performance. The significance of refurbishing existing UK housing to help the government achieve its climate change targets has been widely recognised. However, the current practices for UK retrofitting, with one of the oldest domestic stocks in Europe, are still confronted by technical and social challenges such as late adoption of BPS tools, difficulties in effectively measuring energy consumption and disruption to users. Therefore, it is essential to improve the existing practices of the domestic retrofit process. Building Information Modelling (BIM) offers, potentially, a comprehensive and integrated platform for improving the retrofit process. Although BIM has been applied in many large-scale projects, it has not been used extensively for small-scale retrofit schemes in the UK. This study sort to test two common misconceptions – (i) BIM is only for complex large-scale projects; (ii) BIM is only for new projects - by investigating the potential implementation of BIM in energy efficient domestic retrofit in practice in the UK. This thesis has explored how the efficiency of the retrofit process could be improved through BIM implementation. A critical review of the literature was followed by a series of semi-structured interviews with professionals. An experimental study demonstrated why the existing simulation methods, such as ‘detailed modelling', are not effective and why it is necessary to enhance the existing practices. One of the main barriers to improving the efficiency of existing practices is using Building Performance Simulation (BPS) tools too late in the retrofit process. Based on the experimental study, the results of detailed modelling, using DesignBuilder, were very accurate; however, such results are frequently used in an evaluative rather than proactive way in the existing practices. Running energy simulation is a lengthy process and putting architectural information into the BPS tools not only requires more time than is usually available at the early stage but, also, defining the thermal view by energy experts is subjective. Furthermore, evaluating the accuracy of ‘standards and procedures' approaches, Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP) and Passive House Planning Package (PHPP), illustrated that analysing energy performance based on the inaccurate or notional assumptions, regardless of the unique characteristics of the projects are often arbitrary, unreliable and inaccurate. Therefore, BIM simulation approaches were evaluated and tested through a real-world case study. The scope of this research is limited to energy performance modelling process; however, the basic methods and principles could be also applied to other types of performance analysis. The experimental project, evaluating two BIM simulation approaches, integrated and interoperable BIM, provided the opportunity to evaluate BIM’s usefulness in energy performance simulation and assess the accuracy and reliability of the outputs compared with the results of two-years of monitoring a house. Integrated BIM simulation approach, Graphisoft EcoDesigner Star, provided effortless interoperability and improved the effectiveness of the process. However, the integrated BIM approach requires intelligent guidance and depends on the vendors to integrate performance simulation tools into their BIM environment. The interoperable BIM, through gbXML, can facilitate the integration of BPS tools in the early design stage. By improving interoperability at the early design stage and adopting BIM, identified challenges could be addressed, such as, uncertainty about the quality of retrofit measure, lack of interoperability between BPS tools and BIM, and time-consuming iterative modelling. The main contribution of this research is in identifying the barriers and potentials of BIM in energy performance simulation to enhance the existing practices of the retrofit process through the experimental study. However, this research is a starting point, where an initial analysis of the problem and its solution has commenced.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Kiviniemi, A and Sharples, S
Uncontrolled Keywords: architect; building information modelling; building performance; case study; climate change; energy consumption; government; integration
Index terms: retrofitting, housing, climate change, integration, building stock, building performance, accuracy, experiment, interview, energy simulation, implementation, modelling, energy performance, early design stage, interoperability, passive house, performance analysis, energy consumption, monitoring, architect, effectiveness, building performance simulation, efficiency, energy performance simulation, building information modelling, CO2 emissions, package, case study, performance simulation, platform, Europe
Subjects: physical geography and landforms, design process, digital design, health safety and environment, asset management, quality assurance, digital engineering, construction type, climate science, analytical methods, contractual arrangements, performance management, renovation and retrofit, professional development, organizational analysis, information systems, systems and processes, air quality, profession, data collection methods, control systems, modelling and simulation, data analysis and analytics, energy systems
Topics: Quality Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Procurement, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Site Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here