Haller, M and Stehn, L (2010) Standardizing the pre-design-phase for improved efficiency in off-site housing projects. In: Egbu, C (ed.) Proceedings of 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2010, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
Long erection times on-site and project-specific design work, performed by consultants, generally accounts for a large part of correction and building costs in construction projects. In a typical Swedish housing project, the pre- and design phase accounts for about 10-12 % of the total costs. Due to a lack of standardized conceptualization procedures, much of the design work is reiterated in each project, and thus avoidable costs are incurred. In order to minimize these problems an open building system, called MFB, which exploits standardized technical solutions, design and construction processes for off-site prefabricated housing is under development. The MFB system developer will provide a process manual that describes, in detail, standardized design, construction, and erection processes. The open building system relies on close cooperation with local, often small to medium-sized, enterprises that can efficiently undertake “local” building projects. Here, we present and analyse a standard procedure for the pre-design-phase to incorporate in a MFB-process manual. The pre-design-phase of a MFB-building project was recorded and analysed in terms of efficiency. A detailed process map is presented, showing that 122 process steps were logged from the first contact with the client until the generation of the tender. By standardizing the pre-design-phase, the number of essential activities could be reduced by 47%. An improvement in time efficiency of the pre-design-phase with co-instantaneous generation of effective cost estimates should lead to lower building costs in general. Furthermore, by tightly standardizing and controlling the process, it should be possible to repeat projects (or many aspects of projects), without repeating much of the pre-design-phase, even if the actors change.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | pre-design-phase; process management; project management; project mapping; standardization |
| Index terms: | design and construction, housing project, process management, mapping, open building, time efficiency, design phase, construction project, standardization, housing, project management, cost estimate, cooperation, efficiency |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, design flexibility, project management theory and practice, performance management, psychology, management, spatial and geospatial analysis, contractual arrangements, performance measurement, construction type, professional practice, production management, housing and residential development |
| Topics: | Project Management, Procurement, Design Practice, Business Strategy, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Cost Management, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here