Mavroudhis, V G (2017) Understanding one institutions' process in preparing civil engineering students to be globally competent. EdD thesis, Northeastern University, USA.
Abstract
Civil engineering is an increasingly dynamic and global industry experiencing expansion cross borders, resulting in new required competencies sought out by employers and reflected in updated undergraduate program outcomes. These new competencies include attributes that result in global competence. Institutions of higher learning need to increasingly respond to these changes to ensure they are preparing globally competent civil engineers. With limitations in the rigidity of the curriculum, yet, significance of preparing globally competent civil engineers, this is an important problem to study. This case study investigated the process by which one four-year private research institution in the Northeast prepared its civil engineering students to be globally competent, how effective they are in this process, and identification of improvements. A document review analysis and qualitative semi-structured interview phase of 13 participants, representing academia, career education, alumni, and industry who are directly affiliated with this institution was conducted. National professional association feedback was also secured to complement research findings. Using Saldana (2009) and Stake (1995) as guiding principles for coding and thematic analysis and triangulation of multiple data sources, results indicated that 1) the institution’s process is complex and inter-related with multiple internal and external stakeholders, 2) the institution is generally effective in its preparation of globally competent engineers as the primary goal is to develop competent engineers with transferrable skills to any environment, and 3) despite this general effectiveness, opportunities to augment its process in developing globally competent civil engineering students exists.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Dean, M |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competence; education; skills; civil engineering; feedback; learning; professional; thematic analysis; case study; interview; civil engineer; employer; stakeholder |
| Index terms: | external stakeholder, program, undergraduate, academia, engineer, research institution, career, competence, effectiveness, triangulation, thematic analysis, civil engineer, required competency, case study, interview |
| Subjects: | profession, performance management, data collection methods, professional development, personnel development, research management, methods and analysis, software systems, curriculum development, research design and methodology, educational institutions, sociology |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Education, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here