Patel, H (2017) The library: physicality and enactment. PhD thesis, University of Reading, UK.
Abstract
The physical building formed at the end of a building project creates an illusion of completion. The purpose of this research is to study adaptations of a building after it was constructed, and, in doing so, to explicate a novel conception of that building. The adaptations of the University of Reading's 50-year-old library are studied by combining ethnographic and historical methods. Rather than bracketing a building to its physicality, such boundary is doubted. Moving beyond the conception of buildings as fixed physical objects, a praxiographic approach is adopted to conceptualise a building as a series of enactments. Such approach focuses on the practices in which the physical building is involved. Three specific enactments of the library building are studied: issuing a book, using a table and making an exhibition. Enactments involve heterogeneous entities; hence, a building is heterogeneous (not merely a physical object), always in the making, always unfinished. The practices of enacting a building illustrate how overly simplified design speculations are defied. Design strategies for adaptability often assume that adaptability resides in the physicality of the building. Instead, this research suggests that adaptability resides in the relations of the physical building with heterogonous entities. Adaptations of such a building may or may not be due to the change in the physicality of the building. The building is, thus, a fluid object. Moreover, multiple versions of the library co-exist. Adaptations of a building are imbued with the 'politics-of-what' in prioritising one version of the library over other versions. The physicality of the building is manipulated in such politics. This has implications for renewal of building design practices to become sensitive to the ways in which multiple versions of a building may be politicised.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; architectire; building design; ethnography; history; library; physicality; politics-of-what; renewal; university |
| Index terms: | ethnography, prioritizing, adaptability, adaptation, renewal, design strategy, building design, politics, history |
| Subjects: | design methods, decision analysis, qualitative and interpretive research, renovation and retrofit, political science, architectural design, architectural and construction history, user focus |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Governance, Design Practice, Risk Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here