Rezakhani, P (2017) Hybrid fuzzy-bayesian dynamic decision support tool for resource-based scheduling of construction projects. PhD thesis, University of Missouri - Kansas City, USA.
Abstract
This dissertation proposes a flexible and intelligent decision support tool for scheduling and resource allocation of construction projects. A hybrid Fuzzy-Bayesian scheduling network and a new optimization model and solution approach have been developed to assess the combinatory effect of different risk factors on scheduling and optimize the time-cost trade off. Developed decision support tool employs interval-valued fuzzy numbers and Bayesian networks to dynamically quantify uncertainty and predict project performance during its make-span. Using interval-valued fuzzy numbers makes the model more flexible and intelligent comparing to conventional fuzzy risk assessment models through incorporating the decision makers' confidence degree. The linguistic assessments of experts regarding the likelihood and severity of increase or decrease in task duration and cost when influenced by different risk factors are used to generate a set of duration and cost prior-probability distributions. A learning dynamic Bayesian scheduling network is developed to probabilistically combine the prior-probability distributions with initial activity duration estimates and update them as new evidence in form of actual activity data feed into the network. This model also predicts project performance at any point of time during its execution. Optimization model explicitly considers variation of time-cost trade off relationship during project execution and complex payment terms to maximize the project net present value (NPV). A sequential solution approach is proposed to combine a procedure for updating time-cost trade off data, and mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) methods to obtain optimal project crashing and scheduling solutions that is adaptive to the current project status and crew productivity. Capability of proposed model in quantifying uncertainty at initial phases of project where project performance data are scarce, learning from data and predicting project performance, considering financial aspects of scheduling through optimal resource allocation and providing useful and clear advice to managers are advantages of developed decision support tool over already existing approaches.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Halmen, C |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision support; duration; optimization; uncertainty; construction project; crew productivity; learning; payment; productivity; programming; resource allocation; risk assessment; scheduling; linear programming; net present value; project performance |
| Index terms: | net present value, evidence, duration, construction project, risk factor, bayesian network, decision support, risk assessment, variation, probability distribution, dissertation, crashing, resource allocation, estimate, project performance, crew productivity, programming, scheduling, manager, linear programming, productivity |
| Subjects: | programming, operations research, probabilistic model, research dissemination and communication, evaluation and assessment methods, financial risk, algorithms, practitioner, production management, project management theory and practice, project controls, resource management, environmental hazards, management, economic analysis, financial and cost management, statistical analysis, decision analysis, contractual condition |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Time Control, Contract Administration, Project Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Site Management, Risk Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here