Shen, X (2017) Location-based leading indicators in BIM for construction safety. PhD thesis, University of Alabama, USA.
Abstract
The US construction industry continues to experience a high number of injuries and fatalities in comparison to other US industrial sectors (BLS 2013). Although the U.S. construction accounts for only 4% of total employment, the industry experiences a disproportionate 19% of the total fatalities experienced by the U.S. workforce (BLS 2014). An enhanced understanding of safety leading indicators for construction sites can be an influential factor in mitigating existing hazards and predicting future hazards (Hinze et al. 2013, Hinze 2006). Although construction companies in the U.S. are required by OSHA regulation to report all fatalities, injuries, and illnesses that occur on construction sites, a more concerted effort including research and implementation is required for safety leading indicators including near miss reporting and hazard identification. This research seeks to test the hypothesis that it is feasible to collect, analyze, and disseminate safety leading indicators through location-based information and visualization. Because one of the most impactful transitions in the construction industry in the past decade has been a transition to digitized construction documents with visualization of construction processes through Building Information Modeling (BIM), BIM provides a real-time visualization and communication platform for construction stakeholders (Azhar 2011, Eastman et al. 2011). Furthermore, the construction industry is transitioning from lagging or reactive safety data collection (i.e. , injuries, illnesses and fatalities) to pro-active or leading indicator safety data collection (i.e. , near misses and hazard identification) (Hallowell et al. 2013). This research advocates for the effective retrieval, analysis, visualization and dissemination of safety leading indicator data through created databases, algorithms and BIM functionality. Since a large majority of function components in a BIM are location-based, the outcome of this research is limited to location-based safety leading indicators (i.e. , leading indicator safety data that can be assigned to a specific location). The research approach is divided into three major components: 1) near miss reporting, 2) automatic hazardous proximity zone generation, and 3) site location optimization. The framework will be evaluation in controlled laboratory settings as well as active construction sites. Throughout the research methodology, feedback and mentorship from construction engineering and management employees will be collected and integrated. This research connects the capabilities of BIM to safety data collection, storage, analysis and visualization.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Marks, E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | hazards; optimization; workforce; construction site; building information model; building information modeling; communication; construction engineering; employment; feedback; regulation; safety; visualization; employee; stakeholders |
| Index terms: | construction company, functionality, construction site, injury, laboratory, visualization, construction safety, regulation, documents, influential factor, construction process, dissemination, database, hazard identification, illness, employment, platform, building information modelling, construction industry, implementation, fatalities, research methodology, construction engineering |
| Subjects: | knowledge translation, professional development, engineering methods, management, health risk and incident analysis, design practice, political science, environmental health, information systems, industry analysis, health conditions and diseases, data management, research design and methodology, risk assessment, work location, financial risk, digital design, research management, building construction, organization, contractual arrangements, design features |
| Topics: | Governance, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Human Resources, Risk Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here