Song, S (2017) Construction equipment travel path visualization and productivity evaluation. PhD thesis, University of Alabama, USA.
Abstract
The U.S. construction industry represents approximately 4% of the U.S. gross domestic product (BEA 2015) and currently involves over 6 million workers employed by an estimated 750,000 construction firms (BLS 2015). Within this industry, productivity is a key driver for economic growth and strongly affects prosperity for the country (Vogl and Abdel-Wahab 2014). More specifically, higher construction productivity and more reliable installation (quality) translates into higher wages and increased profits (Vogl and Abdel-Wahab 2014). On many construction projects, productivity is defined or greatly impacted by equipment cycle time. Furthermore, the U.S. construction industry continues to be one of the more dangerous work environments for employees (BLS 2015). Construction workers in the U.S. experience a disproportionate number of fatalities when compared other major industrial sectors in the U.S. (BLS 2013). Visibility has proven to be a major cause of accidents on construction sites (Hinze and Teizer 2011). This research seeks to prove the hypothesis that visibility and location-based data can be automatically collected and analyzed for construction equipment operators to assess a construction equipment cycle. As one of the more promising recent implementations in the construction industry, sensing and design technology provide unique opportunities to capture and analyze location-based information on construction sites. These technologies can enable productivity managers to identify, assess, and decrease the overall cycle time of a specific operation. This research implements Building Information Modeling (BIM), Global Positioning System (GPS) location identification, and laser scanning to enable automated data collection and analysis. The overall objective of the research is to automatically capture and analyze elements of a construction equipment cycle. The outcomes of this research addresses the following key components of an equipment cycle time: 1) automated cycle time path planning, 2) location-based data capture and analysis of real-time equipment cycles, and 3) equipment path environment visualization. The research framework was tested with active construction site data, and feedback from the workforce and management was assessed and integrated into the research approach. The research has the potential to improve productivity on construction sites and enhance construction employee safety performance. It will also assist in adding a link between productivity planning and management and existing project BIMs.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Moynihan, G P and Marks, E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | economic growth; workforce; construction equipment; construction firms; construction project; construction site; equipment; wages; building information model; building information modeling; feedback; laser scanning; productivity; safety; visualization; construction worker; employee; gross domestic product |
| Index terms: | gross domestic product, construction equipment, building information modelling, construction employee, productivity, work environment, fatalities, construction worker, economic growth, construction productivity, construction industry, implementation, wages, manager, profit, construction firm, construction site, laser scanning, construction project, safety performance, visualization |
| Subjects: | construction equipment, design practice, health risk and incident analysis, management, industry analysis, information systems, occupational health and safety management, work location, production management, economic development, business economics, practitioner, organization, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, analytical methods, operations management |
| Topics: | Plant and Equipment, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Site Management, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Procurement, Sustainability, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here