Zanni, M A (2017) Communication of sustainability information and assessment within BIM-enabled collaborative environment. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.
Abstract
Sustainable performance of buildings has become a major concern among construction industry professionals. However, sustainability considerations are often treated as an add-on to building design, following ad hoc processes for their implementation. As a result, the most common problem to achieve a sustainable building outcome is the absence of the right information at the right time to make critical decisions. For design team members to appreciate the requirements of multidisciplinary collaboration, there is a need for transparency and a shared understanding of the process. The aim of this study is to investigate, model, and facilitate the early stages of building information modelling (BIM) enabled sustainable building design (SBD) by formalising the ad hoc working relationships of the best practices in order to standardise the optimal collaboration workflows. Thus, this research strives to improve BIM maturity level for SBD, assisting in the transition from ad hoc to defined , and then, to managed . For this purpose, this study has adopted an abductive research approach (iterative process of induction and deduction) for theory building and testing. Four stages of data collection have been conducted, which have resulted in a total of 32 semi-structured interviews with industry experts from 17 organisations. Fourteen best practice case studies have been identified, and 20 incidents narratives have been collected applying the Critical Decision Method (CMD) to examine roles and responsibilities, resources, information exchanges, interdependencies, timing and sequence of events, and critical decisions. As a result, the research has classified the critical components of SBD into a framework utilising content and thematic analyses. These have included the definition of roles and competencies that are essential for SBD along with the existing opportunities, challenges, and limitations. Then, schedules of services for SBD have been developed for the following stages of the RIBA Plan of Work 2013: Stage 0 (strategic definition), Stage 1 (preparation and brief), and Stage 2 (concept design). The above-mentioned SBD components have been coordinated explicitly into a systematic process, which follows concurrent engineering (CE) principles utilising integrated definition (IDEF) structured diagramming techniques (IDEF0 and IDEF3). The results have identified the key players' roles and responsibilities, tasks (BIM uses), BIM-based deliverables, and critical decision points for SBD. Furthermore, green BIM box (GBB) workflow management prototype tool has been developed to analyse communication and delivery of BIM-enabled SBD in a centralised system (Common Data Environment, CDE). GBB’s system architecture for SBD process automation is demonstrated through use case scenarios utilising the OMG UML (object management group’s unified modelling language) notation. The proposed solution facilitates the implementation of BIM, information communication technology (ICT), and building performance analysis (BPA) software to realise the benefits of combining distributed teams expertise holistically into a common process. Finally, the research outcomes have been validated through academic and industrial reviews that have led to the refinement of the IDEF process model and framework. It has been found that collaborative patterns are repeatable for a variety of different non-domestic building types such as education, healthcare, and offices. Therefore, the research findings support the idea that a detailed process, which follows specified communication patterns, can assist in achieving sustainability targets efficiently in terms of time, cost, and effort.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | best practice; building design; building information modelling; collaboration; performance; sustainable building; professional; sustainability; workflow; Mali |
| Index terms: | plan of work, workflow, thematic analysis, common data environment, system architecture, sustainable building design, sustainable building, narrative, collaboration, theory building, information exchange, building performance, prototype, design team, interview, transparency, construction industry, testing, implementation, modelling, automation, best practice, concurrent engineering, non-domestic building, concept design, maturity level, case study, building information modelling, building design, Mali |
| Subjects: | professional development, methods and analysis, qualitative and interpretive research, engineering methods, management, information systems, industry analysis, computing systems, business, data collection methods, energy systems, data science, modelling and simulation, design process, sustainable construction, evaluation, Geography, automation and robotics, quality assurance, design theory, construction type, architectural design, analytical methods, contractual arrangements, professional practice, operations management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here