Human-centered automation for resilience in acquiring construction field information

Zhang, C (2017) Human-centered automation for resilience in acquiring construction field information. PhD thesis, Arizona State University, USA.

Abstract

Resilient acquisition of timely, detailed job site information plays a pivotal role in maintaining the productivity and safety of construction projects that have busy schedules, dynamic workspaces, and unexpected events. In the field, construction information acquisition often involves three types of activities including sensor-based inspection, manual inspection, and communication. Human interventions play critical roles in these three types of field information acquisition activities. A resilient information acquisition system is needed for safer and more productive construction. The use of various automation technologies could help improve human performance by proactively providing the needed knowledge of using equipment, improve the situation awareness in multi-person collaborations, and reduce the mental workload of operators and inspectors. Unfortunately, limited studies consider human factors in automation techniques for construction field information acquisition. Fully utilization of the automation techniques requires a systematical synthesis of the interactions between human, tasks, and construction workspace to reduce the complexity of information acquisition tasks so that human can finish these tasks with reliability. Overall, such a synthesis of human factors in field data collection and analysis is paving the path towards “Human-Centered Automation” (HCA) in construction management. HCA could form a computational framework that supports resilient field data collection considering human factors and unexpected events on dynamic job sites. This dissertation presented an HCA framework for resilient construction field information acquisition and results of examining three HCA approaches that support three use cases of construction field data collection and analysis. The first HCA approach is an automated data collection planning method that can assist 3D laser scan planning of construction inspectors to achieve comprehensive and efficient data collection. The second HCA approach is a Bayesian model-based approach that automatically aggregates the common sense of people from the internet to identify job site risks from a large number of job site pictures. The third HCA approach is an automatic communication protocol optimization approach that maximizes the team situation awareness of construction workers and leads to the early detection of workflow delays and critical path changes. Data collection and simulation experiments extensively validate these three HCA approaches.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Tang, P
Uncontrolled Keywords: complexity; liability; optimization; reliability; simulation; construction project; construction worker; equipment; automation; collaboration; communication; productivity; safety; experiment
Index terms: experiment, workload, critical path, liability, paving, complexity, human factor, workflow, collaboration, construction project, acquisition, inspection, productivity, simulation experiment, aggregate, workspace, planning method, internet, interaction, construction worker, automation, dissertation, human-performance
Subjects: modelling and simulation, computing systems, business, data collection methods, systems engineering, occupational health and safety management, management, operations research, urban planning, human factors and perception, practitioner, materials science, research dissemination and communication, quality assurance, transportation engineering, liability law, behavioral psychology, automation and robotics, production management
Topics: Legal Issues, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Time Control, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here