Al-Saeed, Y W M (2018) Towards developing a sustainability assessment framework for residential buildings in Iraq. PhD thesis, Coventry University, UK.
Abstract
Anthropogenic activities are depleting the planet's natural resources and having a significant negative impact on the environment, leading to manifestations of climate change. A significant proportion of this is the energy consumption within the built environment. There is evidence that the built environment accounts for about 40% of the total energy consumption, 40% of global resources, 25% of water as well as a third of global Green-House Gas (GHG) emissions resulting in global warming. Many sustainability assessment frameworks have been produced for both developed and developing countries to reduce the negative impact of buildings on natural resources and their effects on climate change. In addition, many developed and developing countries have strong energy efficiency components within their building codes. It is argued that the sustainability assessment frameworks are developed with a specific country in mind. Even though the leading assessments such as LEED and BREEAM are used internationally; there is wide academic evidence that these assessments are not very suitable for use in other countries. However, there are countries, such as Iraq, without their own building standards or energy codes. Therefore, this study focuses on developing a sustainability assessment framework for residential buildings in Iraq. The study begins with the conducting of a cross comparison between well-established assessments in the Middle East region and other parts of the world to identify areas of similarity and difference that are most applicable to the building context in Iraq. For this research, a sustainable building assessment was developed using the Delphi technique that relied on achieving a consensus amongst a panel of experts to confirm sustainability performance indicators for Iraq with their relative priorities. This was followed by evaluating the weighting of categories and subcategories for these indicators using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The weighting for water stress issues was highlighted as the most important category, of which 19.6% owing to the scarcity of this resource compared to other categories within the assessment. Finally, the assessment was tested by investigating some of its indicators based on the climate from the current year to 2080 and recommendations based on the final conclusions were provided. The study will contribute to the establishment of benchmarks for residential buildings to be followed by construction stakeholders and academics in Iraq.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Montazami, A |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; energy consumption; residential; sustainability; natural resources; standards; climate change; developing countries; sustainable building; Iraq; Middle East; analytical hierarchy process; Delphi technique; stakeholder |
| Index terms: | evidence, developing country, sustainability assessment, Delphi technique, sustainable building, building code, energy code, energy consumption, global warming, Middle East, sustainability performance, residential building, built environment, BREEAM accreditation, climate change, natural resource, energy efficiency, analytical hierarchy process |
| Subjects: | sustainability assessment, sustainable construction, environmental law, regulatory law, energy systems, environmental policy, decision-making and optimization, physical geography and landforms, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, development economics, construction type, sustainability and energy, environmental resource management, climate science, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, International Construction, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here