Burke, R D (2018) Early design decisions in building materials for higher performing buildings. PhD thesis, Arizona State University, USA.
Abstract
High performing and sustainable building certification bodies continue to update their requirements, leading to scope modification of certifications, and an increasing number of viable sources of environmental information for building materials. In conjunction, the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry is seeing increasing demand for such environmental product information. The industry and certifications are moving from using single attribute environmental information about building materials to lifecycle based information to inform their design decisions. This dissertation seeks to understand the current practices, and then focus on strategies to effectively utilize newer sources of environmental product information in high performance building design. The first phase of research used a survey of 119 U.S.-based AEC practitioners experienced in certified sustainable building projects to understand how the numerous sources of environmental information are currently used in the building design process. The second phase asked two focus groups of experienced AEC professionals to develop a Message Sequence Chart (MSC) that documents the conceptual design process for a recently designed building. Then, the focus group participants integrated a new sustainability requirement for building materials, Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs), into their project, and documented the adjustments to their specific design process in a second, modified MSC highlighting potential drivers for inclusion of EPDs. Finally, the author examines the broader applicability of these drivers through case studies. Specifically, 19 certified high-performance building (HPB) case studies, for reviewing the impact of three different potential drivers on the design team’s approach to considering environmental product information during conceptual design of a HPB, as well as the projects certification level. LEED certification has changed the design of buildings, and the new information sources for building materials will inform the way the industry selects building materials. Meanwhile, these information sources will need to expand to include a growing number of products, and potentially more data as the industry’s understanding of the impacts of building materials develops. This research expands upon previous research on LEED certification to illustrates that owner engagement and commitment to the HPB process is a critical success factor for the use of environmental product information about building materials.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Parrish, K |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | sustainability; case studies; focus group; building design; certification; design decision; sustainable building; owner; professional; critical success factor |
| Index terms: | focus group, certification, practitioner, documents, owner, lifecycle, design of building, critical success factor, dissertation, sustainable building, design process, survey, high-performance building design, conceptual design, building material, building design, case study, design team, strategy, commitment, product information, design decision |
| Subjects: | administrative processes, control systems, professional development, innovation studies, energy systems, sustainable construction, sociology, research dissemination and communication, practitioner, architectural design, data collection methods, project delivery, management, building materials, professional practice, design methods, psychology, building design, design practice |
| Topics: | Project Management, Information Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here