Built environment student attitudes toward the environment

Kokkarinen, N and Cotgrave, A (2010) Built environment student attitudes toward the environment. In: Egbu, C (ed.) Proceedings of 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2010, Leeds, UK.

Abstract

Although infrastructure can be categorized as a basic necessity, research has shown that the construction industry has had major impacts on the environment. Incentives and environmental agendas have been put in place, yet these initiatives have been limited in their level of effectiveness. It may be necessary to assess the educational aspect of built environment to implement change. Making students aware of environmental problems caused by traditional building strategies and bringing their attention towards appropriate ways of counteracting such effects would be the starting point for sustainability education to promote positive environmental attitudes. By higher education offering this to students throughout their degree prepares them for the industry with forward thinking ideas on how to incorporate sustainable practices in industry upon degree attainment. Psychological assessment was used as a way to explore whether the type of psychological profiles built environment students had showed a relationship with their environmental knowledge. The results of this pilot study showed that weak negative correlations between neuroticism, extraversion and ecological world view were found. Suggestions are made as how to make these results relevant in an educational setting while also outlining future directions of the research.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: attitudes; education; psychology; sustainability
Index terms: higher education, strategy, sustainable practice, sustainability education, construction industry, psychology, built environment, effectiveness, traditional building
Subjects: construction type, management, performance management, sustainable practices, educational innovation, educational institutions, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, behavioral psychology
Topics: Construction Technology, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Education, Urban Studies, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here