Daheshpour, K (2018) Network level decision support system to assess railway track maintenance needs. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.
Abstract
Maintenance management decision-support systems are needed to help senior decision-makers and asset managers to better plan timely and efficient maintenance. Within the railway industry, several maintenance management decision-support systems have been developed. However, most these operate at project level where decisions are limited to short sections of track. Network level maintenance management systems enable future prediction of the condition of the railway network under different allocation of resources in a manner to provide acceptable levels of safety, reliability and cost. This project describes the development of a theoretical framework for the strategic assessment of network level railway maintenance funding and policy decisions. The model is designed to aid railway asset managers in planning medium to long-term maintenance investment requirements for the railway network. The model is based on stochastic processes which are capable of determining the effects of traffic, maintenance and climate on network condition under any budget scenario.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | climate; funding; investment; liability; maintenance management; policy; railway; reliability; safety; traffic |
| Index terms: | liability, maintenance management, railway track, manager, maintenance management system, funding, decision support |
| Subjects: | liability law, maintenance engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, economic analysis, management, practitioner, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here