Ding, Q (2018) Using social media to evaluate public acceptance of infrastructure projects. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
Abstract
The deficit of infrastructure quality of the United States demands groundbreaking of more infrastructure projects. Despite the potential economic and social benefits brought by these projects, they could also negatively impact the community and the environment, which could in turn affect the implementation and operation of the projects. Therefore, measuring and monitoring public acceptance is critical to the success of infrastructure projects. However, current practices such as public hearings and opinion polls are slow and costly, hence are insufficient to provide satisfactory monitoring mechanism. Meanwhile, the development of state-of-the-art technologies such as social media and big data have provided people with unprecedented ways to express themselves. These platforms generate huge volumes of user-generated content, and have naturally become alternative sources of public opinion. This research proposes a framework and an analysis methodology to use big data from social media (e.g.the microblogging site Twitter) for project evaluation. The framework collects social media postings, analyzes public opinion towards infrastructure projects and builds multi-dimensional models around the big data. The interface and conceptual implementation of each component of the framework are discussed. This framework could be used as a supplement to traditional polls to provide a fast and cost-effective way for public opinion and project risk assessment. This research is followed by a case study applying the framework to a real-world infrastructure project to demonstrate the feasibility and comprehensiveness of the framework. The California High Speed Rail project is selected to be the object of study. It is an iconic and controversial large-scale infrastructure project that faced a lot of criticism, complaints and suggestions. Sentiment analysis, the most important type of analysis on the framework, is discussed concerning its application and implementation in the context of infrastructure projects. A public acceptance model for social media sentiment analysis is proposed and examined, and the best measurement of public acceptance is recommended. Moreover, the case study explores the driving force of the change in public acceptance: the social media events. Events are defined, evaluated, and an event influence quadrant is proposed to categorize and prioritize social media events. Furthermore, the individuals influencing the perceptions of these events, opinion leaders, are also modeled and identified. Three opinion leadership types are defined with top users in each type listed and discussed. A predictive model for opinion leader is also developed to identify opinion leaders using an a priori indicator. Finally, a user profiling model is established to describe social demographic characteristics of users, and each demographic feature is discussed in detail.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Cui, Q |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | measurement; infrastructure project; leadership; monitoring; project evaluation; risk assessment; United States; case study |
| Index terms: | big data, complaint, social benefit, United States, state of the art, methodology, high speed rail, platform, case study, project evaluation, infrastructure project, implementation, social media, monitoring, risk assessment |
| Subjects: | Geography, digital design, financial risk, theoretical framing, research methods, contractual arrangements, research dissemination and communication, infrastructure and transport systems, information systems, conflict resolution, technology adoption, control systems, value management, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here