Elmahroug, M H M (2018) Facilitating effective external stakeholder involvement in the pre-design phase of civil engineering infrastructure projects. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, UK.
Abstract
(Embargoed until 1 July 2022) Due to the lack of agreement on the problems they are meant to address, civil engineering infrastructure projects often become subject to controversy once they enter the public arena. Therefore, a case study research to examine the extent of external stakeholder involvement in the pre-design phase of two civil engineering infrastructure projects from the UK was conducted. The findings revealed that external stakeholders are having limited (if any) input into key aspects of the project defined during the pre-design phase - the earliest phase of the project life cycle. It was found that due to the lack of an overarching approach for project identification, we often see lobby groups mobilising support for a project (solution) that may constitute opportunities to the developers, but neither solve the external stakeholders' problems nor meet their expectations. This results in misalignment of the project purpose and external stakeholder expectations, thereby leading to lack of buy-in from external stakeholders which in turn can limit project success. Consequently, a novel two-stage project identification process for identifying civil engineering infrastructure projects was developed. The proposal brings together infrastructure developers and external stakeholders at an early stage of the project life cycle to first identify problems, and second to generate solutions, assess them and then choose a preferred solution to be included in the feasibility stage. To ensure that the proposal is applicable, it was validated through interviews with project managers, stakeholder managers, project stakeholder organisations and local authorities from the UK. The novelty of the two-stage process is in which project identification, problem solving and stakeholder involvement processes have been synthesised and integrated to fulfil the need for addressing the limited external stakeholder involvement in project identification while being theoretically rigorous.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Tutesigensi, A and Smith, N J |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; civil engineering; developer; infrastructure project; interview; life cycle; problem solving; project manager; project stakeholder; project success; stakeholders; UK |
| Index terms: | project success, case study, project manager, life cycle, lobby, design phase, infrastructure project, interview, proposal, manager, local authority, problem solving, project stakeholder, external stakeholder, stakeholder involvement, misalignment |
| Subjects: | practitioner, engineering problems, project planning, professional practice, architectural elements, decision-making and reasoning, value management, profession, data collection methods, participation process, project management theory and practice, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Design Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here