Perspectives on modelling BIM-enabled estimating practices

Olatunji, O A and Sher, W (2014) Perspectives on modelling BIM-enabled estimating practices. Construction Economics and Building, 14(4), pp. 32-53. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

BIM-enabled estimating processes do not replace or provide a substitute for the traditional approaches used in the architecture, engineering and construction industries. This paper explores the impact of BIM on these traditional processes. It identifies differences between the approaches used with BIM and other conventional methods, and between the various construction professionals that prepare estimates. We interviewed 17 construction professionals from client organizations, contracting organizations, consulting practices and specialist-project firms. Our analyses highlight several logical relationships between estimating processes and BIM attributes. Estimators need to respond to the challenges BIM poses to traditional estimating practices. BIM-enabled estimating circumvents long-established conventions and traditional approaches, and focuses on data management. Consideration needs to be given to the model data required for estimating, to the means by which these data may be harnessed when exported, to the means by which the integrity of model data are protected, to the creation and management of tools that work effectively and efficiently in multi-disciplinary settings, and to approaches that narrow the gap between virtual reality and actual reality. Areas for future research are also identified in the paper. Oluwole Alfred Olatunji and Willy Sher.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: BIM; BIM-enabled estimating; estimating; tendering
Index terms: contracting organization, data management, integrity, construction industry, estimate, modelling, estimating, client organization, construction professional, virtual reality, estimator
Subjects: professional development, practitioner, health safety and environment, client relations, virtual reality, profession, analytical methods, financial and cost management, industry analysis, data management
Topics: Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here