Innocent Jr., M J F (2018) Predicting military construction project time outcomes using data analytics. PhD thesis, George Washington University, USA.
Abstract
The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is the primary construction agent for the Department of Defense (DoD). Each year the DoD invests billions of dollars in military construction (MILCON) projects in support of the U.S. armed forces missions all over the world. The USACE contracts top design and construction firms to help them meet their objectives. USACE's projects are highly visible to top DoD officials and to the U.S. Congress. Although construction management expertise are gained through many years of experience managing MILCON projects, and despite significant amount of data collected from past projects, completing projects on time remains a challenge. This research uses predictive modeling to analyses 466 completed MILCON projects and identify key factors that influence project time and proposes a model that predicts project time outcomes. The model generates accurate results and serves as a useful tool in the early phases of project life cycle. This research provides a useful analysis that shades light on how each key factor affects project time performance. Additionally, this research finds that duration of large MILCON projects are often underestimated and projects that are more likely to be completed late are those with large estimated duration and low estimated cost. This work makes a significant contribution to the fields of systems engineering, engineering management and project management.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Wasek, J S and Franz, A Y |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction firms; decision making; duration; military construction; performance; life cycle; systems engineering; United States |
| Index terms: | military construction, systems engineering, engineer, life cycle, shade, design and construction, project management, duration, predictive modelling, United States, construction firm, decision-making, time performance, management expertise, engineering management, agent |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, project controls, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, design elements, project management theory and practice, professional development, prediction and forecasting, profession, value management, control systems, Geography, contractual arrangements, organization, practitioner |
| Topics: | Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Procurement, Design Practice, Time Control, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here