Jafari, A (2018) A decision-making framework for the selection of sustainable alternatives for energy-retrofits. PhD thesis, University of New Mexico, USA.
Abstract
Buildings are major consumers of energy worldwide. On the other hand, over 60% of the US housing inventory is over 30 years old and a large number of these homes are energy inefficient. Therefore, it is essential to target the existing building stock for energy efficient interventions as a key to substantially reduce the adverse impacts of buildings on the environment and economy. Building energy retrofitting has emerged as a primary strategy for reducing energy use and carbon emissions in existing buildings. An energy retrofit can be defined as a physical or operational change in a building, its energy-consuming equipment, or its occupants' energy-use behavior to convert the building to a lower energy consuming facility. Energy retrofitting could result in additional sustainable benefits such as reducing maintenance costs, reducing air emissions, creating job opportunities, enhancing human health, and improving thermal comfort among others. One of the main challenges in building energy retrofitting is that several combinations of applicable energy consumption reducing measures can be considered to retrofit a building and it is a difficult task to choose the best retrofit strategy. Although numerous resources provide advice on how to retrofit a building, decisions regarding the optimal combination of retrofitting measures for a specific building are typically complex. In addition, most of the decisions for energy retrofits are based on limited cost categories rather than environmental and social considerations. The main goal of this study is to develop a decision support system that integrates sustainable criteria (i.e. economic, environmental, and social benefits) in decision-making in energy retrofits. This goal will achieved through following objectives: (1) Determining the impact of building life-cycle on energy retrofitting decision-making; (2) Identifying and quantifying the sustainable benefits of building energy retrofitting to be used as an objective function in optimization problems; (3) Developing a systematic approach to select among different sustainable decision criteria for energy retrofitting decision-making; and (4) Developing and demonstrating a decision-making optimization model to select the best energy retrofitting alternative for a specific building while maximizing its sustainable benefits. First a life-cycle cost analysis of the case study is presented in terms of energy retrofitting. This life-cycle cost analysis is used to explore the process of decision-making in energy retrofits. Then, a comprehensive study on identifying and quantifying the sustainable benefits of energy retrofits is performed that can be used in decision-making. Different tools such as literature review, surveys, Delphi technique, concept mapping approach, hedonic price modeling, and statistical analysis are used in this step. After that, a Sustainable Energy Retrofit (SER) decision support system is proposed. Finally, the application of this decision support system on a case study of a house located in Albuquerque, New Mexico is explored. This research contributes to the body of knowledge by: (1) Integrating sustainable impacts of building energy retrofits (i.e. Economic, Environmental, and social) in decision-making; (2) Proposing a decision matrix that guides decision-makers on how to select the objective function(s) to formulate an optimization problem that results in the selection of the best energy retrofitting strategy, considering the benefits to investors; (3) Introducing a novel simplified energy prediction method by integrating dynamic and static modeling; (4) Measuring the implicit price of energy performance improvements in the US residential housing market; (5) Identifying, categorizing, and mapping the social sustainability criteria of energy improvements in existing buildings; and last but not least (6) Developing a decision-support system for energy retrofitting projects that integrates the above approaches. The energy retrofitting decision-making model developed in this research can be imp emented for different types of buildings to help decision-makers select the optimum energy retrofit strategy that not only maximizes monetary benefits, but also maximize environmental and social benefits. The presented research can also help homeowners to plan or evaluate their retrofitting strategies.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Valentin, V |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon emissions; decision support; energy consumption; residential; sustainability; hedonic price; building stock; homes; inventory; cost analysis; retrofit; Mexico; energy performance; statistical analysis; thermal comfort; case study; Delphi technique |
| Index terms: | social benefit, energy retrofitting, decision support, human health, prediction method, cost analysis, homeowner, residential housing, Mexico, survey, strategy, literature review, hedonic price, building stock, Delphi technique, mapping, decision-making, housing, retrofitting, retrofit strategy, concept mapping, energy-use behaviour, body of knowledge, carbon emission, case study, inventory, investor, statistical analysis, thermal comfort, decision criteria, energy consumption, social sustainability, maintenance cost, sustainable energy, energy performance, modelling, energy use |
| Subjects: | renewable energy, knowledge management, analytical methods, construction type, climate science, health behaviours and lifestyles, asset management, communities and social development, theoretical framing, spatial and geospatial analysis, Geography, inventory management, real estate economics, data science, data analysis and analytics, energy systems, financial and cost management, data collection methods, decision analysis, sociology, environmental engineering, design practice, management, financial management, renovation and retrofit, public and environmental health |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Supply Chain Management, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here