Abusnina, H (2019) Combining engineering and data-driven approaches to model the risk of excavation damage to underground natural gas facilities. PhD thesis, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies, USA.
Abstract
In the United States there are thousands of gas pipe miles, long grids, and networks of natural gas lines across the states. Recent pipeline leaks and explosions in various regions have driven the industry to re-evaluate on-going efforts aimed at aggressive pursuit of preventive strategies. Considering that safety and environmental risk is a major issue, particularly in cases where underground gas line damages and other explosions are involved, pipeline accidental risk represents both financial and social interests in the gas pipeline industry. It is possible to, knowingly or unknowingly, damage underground gas services, water services, electrical services, etc. Incidents involving infrastructure damage are far more common than perceived; and these incidents result in hundreds-of-thousands, if not millions, of dollars in repair or replacement. Damages to underground facilities may occur by large construction contractors or by homeowners. The main objective of this research is two-fold: a) to determine the important risk factors contributing to the underground gas pipe damages; b) to identify inputs required for an effective evaluation and assessment of the risk encountered in exchange of information between different parties involved during the repair of underground gas pipelines. Predictive Model will be developed based on machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression) to be used in predicting the important risk factors affecting the underground Gas Pipe Damages. The research will systematically analyze the risk of underground gas pipeline network damage including; process the data collected from agency, organize/classify the data based on certain parameters, process the data, develop integrated risk model and influence diagram. Next, Bayesian Network will be developed based on the derived important factors, and calculated probabilities for each attribute.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Gong, J |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | pipeline; safety; United States |
| Index terms: | bayesian network, pipeline, logistic regression, risk factor, strategy, damages, homeowner, United States, machine learning, repair, agency, construction contractor, environmental risk, replacement, excavation |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, probabilistic model, sociology, management, artificial intelligence, dispute resolution, environmental hazards, financial risk, Geography, maintenance engineering, construction operations, practitioner, materials science |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here